New Release Update and Specials Expire Tomorrow!

Hi Friend,
Thank you for your continued to support in the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference Series of Presentations! We’ll have another new release out next week, but in the meantime here are some of the latest updates! 
We have already released Jim Murray’s demonstration video of his Dynaflux Alternator and other devices that were shown to some Japanese businessmen. We have also already released his Patent Collection. 
For the first time, we are no releasing a BRAND NEW video, which is a private tour of Jim Murray’s lab where he shows some more demos including some machines that he has never shown before! This video shows you what normally only investors would see under a heavy non-disclosure agreement – so get your hands on a copy of this while you can! 
In 22 HOURS, we’re releasing the FULL PACKAGE, which includes the above mentioned video and patent collection, but also the * NEW * video of the private tour of Jim’s Lab. This will be available at a lower introductory special, which will expire next week so when we send out a link tomorrow, make sure to get your copy early! Stay tuned…

Here is an interview with Eric that has been unlisted for a while, but is now public on Youtube. Eric covers a wide range of topics and he discusses a bit about his most recent groundbreaking presentation The Extraluminal Transmission Systems of Tesla and Alexanderson – watch it now:

Eric’s presentation is currently discounted but this discount expires tomorrow night at midnight so make sure you take advantage of this introductory special right now:
At the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference, Paul Babcock and Jim Murray talk about the SERPS technology invented by Jim and replicated by Paul. The  SERPS machine in this interview has a COP of 47.9, which is 4790% of the input net energy! This video has been unlisted on Youtube but is now public so check it out now:
Their presentation from the conference, The Secret to Tesla’s Power Magnification discusses the science behind this mind-blowing machine and it reveals the origins are actually in Tesla’s work, which almost nobody has ever quite comprehended or even recognized. This presentation is also current discounted but this special expires tomorrow night at midnight so get your copy now:
Ignition Secrets and Water Fuel Secrets has been available only as books with some supporting videos, but for the first time ever, you will be able to have a full video presentation that was filmed at the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference. 
The Ignition Secrets presentation goes into more details about the science of the plasma ignition quite a bit deeper than what is in the book and the Water Fuel Secrets presentation also goes into more details on the production of an on-demand fuel with nothing more than water, air and electricity.
BOTH presentations contain powerful references directly from NASA, JPL and other high level scientific organization validating all the claims for not only the plasma ignition but also for on-demand hydrogen gas production. You will also learn of a new theory about how and why “HHO Boosters” actually work as a fuel supplement and it dispels the myths about magically rearranged water molecules or other claims about how they’re supposed to work. It will be a breath of fresh air because it makes sense and is backed by quite a bit of research.
You will also see for the first time ever Aaron’s jet engine project – you will see how the exhaust is recycled and other modification that allowed him to run the jet on virtually 0 PSI propane! 
Keep an eye out for this new release next week and look for our email tomorrow with a link to the Dynaflux Alternator Full Package by Jim Murray! 

Aaron & Peter
A & P Electronic Media

* NEW RELEASE * The Extraluminal Transmission Systems of Tesla and Alexanderson by Eric Dollard

Hello Friend,
We are excited to release the presentation that Eric Dollard says is his best one yet! The Extraluminal Transmission Systems of Tesla and Alexanderson is jam packed with 4 hours of priceless teachings from the master himself.
You will learn not only the history of wireless transmission, but the real science of electrostatic transmission systems that are not restricted to the speed of light. In fact, this is not about “faster than light” but rather INSTANTANEOUS meaning there actually is no velocity! That is why it is called Extraluminal (outside of the speed of light constraints) instead of Superluminal (faster than the speed of light).
This science was applied by Tesla and Alexanderson and was used by the US Navy in the famous RCA Bolinas station for ship to shore communication back in WWII. Eric Dollard has improved upon the work of Tesla and Alexanderson in this science and has actually build a full scale working model that demonstrates the principles. The primary application was using this electrostatic antenna system to listen to the Earth signals in order to forecast major earthquakes 24-48 hours ahead of time! The best that conventional science can give us is 30 to 60 seconds, which pales in comparison.
You will also learn how the electron models and Einstein’s science has been erroneously applied to these systems for all these years. And, you will see the truth in a way that has never before been presented.
SPECIAL BONUS – when you get a copy of this * AMAZING * presentation, you will receive a free bonus download, which is an actual guided tour of the Landers facility, which has never been released to the public before!
This presentation is offered at an introductory price, which will expire on July 31, 2014 so make sure to take advantage of this offer now.
Also, if you haven’t had a chance to get your hands on Jim Murray and Paul Babcock’s presentation The Secret of Tesla’s Power Magnification, make sure to get a copy at the discounted price, which will also expire on July 31, 2014.

Get it now:

Aaron & Peter
A & P Electronic Media

NEW RELEASE – The Secret of Tesla’s Power Magnification


The Secret of Tesla's Power Magnification by Jim Murray & Paul BabcockWe’re honored to be able to release Jim Murray and Paul Babcock’s presentation from the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference! This is one of the most, if not THE MOST, anticipated video presentation we have ever made available. Jim & Paul teach the science behind the SERPS (Switched Energy Resonant Power Supply) device, which has the highest publicly demonstrated COP’s that we know of.

The title of the final presentation release is -The Secret of Tesla’s Power Magnification. It’s 2 Hours Long and we’re even including a PDF of the powerpoint for the presentation so you can see everything up close and clear.

Get your copy now:

At the conference – Paul Babcock’s replication of Jim Murray’s SERPS device using his own patented high speed switching method was producing 52.7 Watts of dissipated energy in two light bulbs while the net draw from the power transformer was only 1.1 Watts! That is a COP of 47.9 or 4790% more energy dissipated in the light bulbs than the net draw from the power supply.

This information represents the first public display and explanation of this technology in all of history.  Even Tesla never showed this much about how to accomplish these effects.

Get your copy now:

Aaron & Peter
A & P Electronic Media

Free Video from the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference

  •  FREE Video from 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Hi Friends,
The 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference was an incredible success! Many are saying it is the most important conference they have been to in their lives from any category of conference. 
I’ve been to three conferences: 2010, 2013 and 201. This year’s conference was the best so far! There isn’t even a close second.” – Breck
I drove a total of 3478 miles round trip to attend the convention and was able to personally talk with, and ask questions of, all the presenters. I really appreciated the opportunity for the one on one contact and getting to see the equipment and demonstrations up close and personal! Thanks for holding the convention and thanks to all the presenters! It was time, energy and money well invested.” – Gary Hammond
Enjoyed the conference and was worth the 2700 kms I put on the wife’s van. As a fabricator and builder the conference was a bit overwhelming but the connections I made were well worth the trip. I would go again and look forward to your next one.” – Jerry Sand
FREE Video from 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference
To view this free video from the conference, you must be a subscriber to the Energy Times newsletter. If you are already a subscriber, you will receive an email with the viewing instructions. If not, go here to watch the video:
After you click the confirmation link in the email that comes, the first newsletter will have the video link and password. Make sure to give the video a thumbs up to show your support for all the speakers!
Beginning in two days, the 2014 Conference Film Series will start being released. The first presentation will be the monumental presentation by Jim Murray and Paul Babcock about Jim’s amazing SERPS device. SERPS stands for Switch Energy Resonant Power Supply and is the ultimate in methods for using, storing, and returning electricity to its source!

In the first hour, Jim Murray shows the various machines he built and tested over the last 35 years that lead to the understanding of how to build the SERPS device.  In the second hour, Paul Babcock explains the theoretical operations of the SERPS system showing how it borrows, uses, and returns electrical power to the source.

The presentation then switches to a clip in the exhibit room where the working model was running and demonstrating 4790% MORE WORK THAN IS SUPPLIED IN NET ENERGY FROM THE POWER SUPPLY – THAT IS A COP OF 47.9!!! It ends with a Q&A by Paul back in the meeting room. A separate PDF file of all of the slides shown in the Power Point Presentation will be included.
Aaron & Peter
A & P Electronic Media

2014 Energy Conference Discussion Panel Free Video

This is a panel discussion of 7 speakers at the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference. All 10 were invited but three were not at the table. Speakers in this video, which is moderated by Jeane Manning, author of Breakthrough Power include: Mark McKay, John Polakowski, Eric Dollard, Aaron Murakami, Jim Murray, Paul Babcock and Peter Lindemann.

Free Energy Conference Video Coming

A one hour discussion panel with the speakers at the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference was held right before Eric Dollard’s monumental presentation on the last day.

We will be releasing this video as a FREE DOWNLOAD very soon so stay tuned for details!

In the meantime, here is a bit more about the discussion panel and a few photographs of who participated.

Jim Murray & Paul Babcock SERPS COP 50.0 (5000%) Presentation

Jim Murray and Paul Babcock gave a landmark presentation that really set a precedence for high COP production in an electrical circuit that was actually demonstrated in front of a live audience.

The presentation will be available in about a week through A & P Electronic Media – so join the free conference newsletter to get notice when it is released.

Here is an example of the input compared to the output:

SERPS Input vs Output COP 50.0

For more details, visit this page: SERPS

June 17, 2014 – Energy Times

We’ve all been running in high gear preparing for the conference, which is only 10 days away! If you want to come see the historical presentations, register now as there are only 25 seats left and they’re going quick.
Here is an awesome video of a giant Sterling engine that is producing 1.5kw to provide heat, mechanical energy, cooking heat, etc…
Peter will be giving a sneak peak demonstration at the conference of the machine that will be the basis for the material in the 3rd Bedini book – Bedini SG –
The Complete Advanced Handbook
, which focuses on converting mechanical work to electrical energy. 
There will be more variations presented in the book and the video presentation will be part of the book package, which should be available no later than August. 
If you have seen William F. Skinner’s 1939 Gravity Power Machine, you might be as blow away by it as we have. If you haven’t seen it, watch this:
There are already some replication attempts – here is a link to more details: and a bunch of comments by Aaron Murakami. You’ll also get a link to a paper by Nikola Tesla on the Moon’s Rotation that is relevant to rotating mechanical systems.

There are various ways to rotate a lever in an elliptical orbit like the input lever of the Skinner Gravity Power Machine. Here is a method that is very simple and might just make it easier for people to replicate the machine – you can see the bicycle wheel demo towards the end that demonstrates the principle:

Energy Times


Murakami Elliptical Drive

There are various mechanisms that can cause the top of the input lever of the 1939 Gravity Power machine by William F. Skinner to move in an elliptical orbit.

I already put details on how William Skinner was doing it himself in my video 1939 Gravity Power Reverse Engineering Details FULL VERSION

A simplified method that I came up with is by using a tilted wheel with a connection offset from center. Although from it’s own plane, it is a full circle, on the horizontal plane, it will trace an ellipse.

Here is what I came up with…


1939 Gravity Power Replications & Updates

There are already some replication attempts on the 1939 Gravity Power Machine by William F. Skinner. Beside my own, Eltimple, Shylo and a couple others have been posting their replication attempts here:

Here is Eltimple’s mini replication attempt:

Here are some various comments I made about this Skinner Machine:

Sun, Earth, Moon

The relationship of the upper weight to the lower weight shaft is like the MOON and EARTH. The Earth rotates on its own axis while the Moon does not. However, as the Earth moves through space once around its axis of rotation around the SUN (lever), the moon has made one rotation. In a year is a day and the Earth goes around the Sun one time per day, the Moon has spun 360 degrees in that one day while all the time showing it’s same side to the Earth.

If you took a string with a weight on the end, held it out and turned in a circle, the string would stretch out and the weight would go out and be held by the string. As you turned around in circles on your own axis, the same side of the weight is facing you so to you it is not rotatig on its own axis, however, with each one rotation you make on your own axis, the weight (moon) has indeed revolved 360 degrees in space.

I don’t want to get too much into all of that right now, but something to think about. The whole Skinner mechanism is like the Sun, Earth and Moon where it takes one day for the Earth to revolve around the Sun and the Moon always stays in the same position relative to the Earth and Sun like the 3 points of a right angle triangle and the hypotenuse is from the Sun to Moon and the right angle is at the Earth..

Not a perfect analogy but the principles are all there.

Here is a paper by Nikola Tesla on this concept: The Moon’s Rotation by Nikola Tesla (pdf)

The first force in the Skinner machine is the electric motor, which is mechanical work to turn pulleys by belts to move the mechanism that rotates the input lever in an elliptical motion. The whole machine has multiple levels of leveraging leverage so to speak.

That motor doesn’t need to supply very much work to turn the top of the lever around in an elliptical way because the pivot is way down at the bottom of that level – with let’s say 90% of the length of the lever above the pivot, very little is needed because of the mechanical advantage of the length of the lever.

“Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.” – Archimedes quotes (Mathematician and inventor of ancient Greece, 280-211bc)

That is probably one of a hundred variations of that quote but that’s the point.

The bottom of that “input lever” connected to the translation coupler with coupler freely spinning around it serves as the center axis of rotation for BOTH the upper weight fixed to that coupler plate and the upper part of the lower shaft connected the the coupler plate, which also spins freely from the coupler plate. They both rotate in perfect circles around the bottom of the input lever. But they of course go in an elliptical orbit because that center of axis (bottom part of input lever) for both the upper weight upper part of the lower shaft is moving in the same ellipse as the upper part of the input lever, but just inverse but in the same direction of rotation.

The force imparted by the bottom of the lever to move that part of the translation coupler causes a reaction in the upper weight to whip around in the same direction that the input lever is going – like I showed in the graph paper demo (coupler plate demo – not the upper input mechanism demo). That reaction is possible because of the specific placement of the input lever on the plate in relation to the upper weight placement and lower shaft placement on the plate as well. If the upper weight was on the other side or if the lever was turned in the opposite direction, you lose the effect and try to run the machine backwards.

So the force that gets the upper weight to swing around is directly from the input lever. Once it gets going, it obviously has momentum and when up to speed, the input lever only has to make up for the loss on each rotation, which is almost nothing with no load and still only a small percentage under load.

As the upper weight moves together with the small input of the lever just to maintain that momentum, the lower shaft’s upper part follows it and the center of gravity for the lower weight is constantly moved so it has to constantly fall to the new center of gravity, which it can’t catch up to.

Now look at the whole vertical drive as one unit. The lower shaft and weight are held slightly off center by being held in the translation coupler and that translation coupler is held in place by being connected to the bottom of the input lever. If the input lever is perfectly vertical, it will be perfectly over the bottom part of the lower shaft where the output is. However, although they are in alignment when centered, the lower weight is not because it is off center and an angle dictated by the lower shafts upper connection distance from the lever rod.

If no force was given by the input lever, no matter how small is being input to it at the very top, the whole machine would slow down so it absolutely contributes it’s force to whip the upper weight, which whips the lower shaft around.

Going back to looking at the whole vertical drive assembly, that lower weight is is only a few inches from being balanced…not balanced by the lower shaft being vertical of course, but by having the lower weight angled back instead of tipping forward.

Of course tipping it back would just cause it to freespin around until it is on the incline of the shaft, but we’re looking at where is the center of gravity for the mass of the lower weight and shaft and that is what is important. seeing that they are close to being balanced, it doesn’t take much force to rotate it with this mechanism. Once it is up to speed, the mass is spinning around, which is not locked to the shaft where it is connected to the translation coupler, but it is locked to the part of the shaft that goes out the bottom to pull work from.

That mass spinning around will create some serious torque and it doesn’t take much to get that mass spinning. The bigger the mass, the slower it has to go to produce the same amount of torque. If we had a lower weight the size of a school bus, it could go so slow that at only a couple rotations per minute but would snap a crowbar like a toothpick.

Once the system is synchronized and everything is spinning away, all the momentum of the lower weight and upper weight relieve the input requirement on the input lever so only the loss has to be made up.

Input lever force to kick translation coupler > translation coupler gets this force and helps to kick the upper weight around > that helps to move the shaft to move the lower weight around.

I do want to comment on some comments I’ve seen. Some say it is not gravity, it is the centrifugal force of the lower weight – some are saying it is only gravity, etc… it is all of them combined.

The weight spinning has some serious forces but gravitational potential energy is constantly being turned into rotational mechanical work at the lower weight so it is a combination of both in addition to the input from the input lever. If gravity does not contribute, you then have a closed equilibrium system that is solely reliant on the input to the lever for it’s source potential and it would have no gain.

Yes – it needs to be elliptical. I have worked out multiple ways to cause the input lever to be moved in an ellipse at the top but keep coming back to Skinner’s method as being the best.

In a circular orbit, you get no real reversal or reaction.

With an elliptical orbit, you get a strong one every 180 degrees – at each end of the length – but instead of that reactive power bucking the system, it actually propels it forward.

This machine is a mechanical version of Jim Murray’s SERPS machine in principle but it applies to every machine that takes a reaction and uses it to continue to produce work in the forward direction instead of resisting the production of work.

Newton’s 3rd law of motion is always misunderstood and claimed to be an equal and opposite reaction when in reality, the truth is that the forces are divided between two reference points.

For anyone that isn’t caught up in dogmatic myths, there is no equal and opposite reaction in both elliptical mechanism in the machine thereby violating Newton’s 3rd law of motion the way it is commonly taught because if it applied, each half cycle of the ellipse would buck against the forward motion but it doesn’t – it assist the machine in the forward direction.

It is mechanical jujitsu – using a force that could be in opposition to you but you allow for a method to let it help the progress continue in its same direction. The SERPS machine is electrical jujitsu.

This is the same in the Ramos machine and the Veljko machine as well as mechanical amplifiers designed by Peter Lindemann and some that I’ve even come up with myself. It is a universal principle that applies to EVERY mechanical machine that turns reactive power into positive work in positive time.

So yes, absolutely, it needs to be an elliptical path as a circle will only cause equilibrium in the machine and that is what we want to stay far away from.

Leading Publishers of Advanced Energy Science, Founded in 2008 by Aaron Murakami & Peter Lindemann