At the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference, Geoffrey Miller will be presenting on a massive Newman Motor that he recently built. He’ll also be disclosing a very * RARE * device invented by Joseph Newman that most Newman fans have never heard of. There will be a demo of this device and all details necessary to replicate it will given!
There are only 150 seats available for the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference and they’re going to be sold out months before the conference – register and get your tickets now: 2019 Energy Conference
LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THAT ROTOR!!
Here are the details: NEWMAN’S 10,000 LBS MOTOR IN 2019 & DEMONSTRATION AND EXCLUSIVE FULL DISCLOSURE OF RARE NEWMAN DEVICE – The 2019 talk will be on the NEW 10,000 lbs Joseph Newman Motor built by Geoffrey S. Miller at Energybat Labs. In 2017, he gave a talk about the Newman Motor and a small demo of the motor. This year, Geoffrey Miller will go into a whole new level with the new 10,000 lbs motor. The talk outline is below.
1. History of Newman’s big motors.
2. Who maid the new 10,000 lb. motor
3. Why make a 10,000 lb. motor?
4. What it takes to make a motor this size.
5. What the motor will do.
6. All parts of the motor.
7. All motor data.
8. Power in & Power out.
9. Motor running parts of the lab.
10. Videos of the motor running.
11. Hand out data.
12. Q & A session.
13. A live demo will follow the talk about a Newman device.
It is recommended that you get a copy of Geoffrey Miller’s presentation from the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference, which will lay the foundation for the upcoming talk: NEWMAN MOTOR DISCLOSURE
Here is an interview of me by Greg Carlwood of Higherside Chats, a popular online podcast. The topic focuses on concepts from my presentation Hacking the Ather, which I gave at last year’s 2017 ESTC. This interview was on October 12, 2018.
Hacking the Aether is a simplified Unified Field Model that shows in a very simple way that any relativistic effects are caused by the aether, how the aether has been proven by Dayton Miller and Einstein admitted he had no confidence in his own work anymore, an interferometer experiment that shows the aether is moving from above towards the downward direction causing a gravitational push and many other concepts that are seamlessly tied together.
TeslaStarter, the crowdfunding platform developed by Teslacoin team is focused on funding ‘Free Energy’ projects, it has finally been launched and is ready to start receiving ‘Free Energy’ project propositions. The objective of the platform is to accelerate the transition to a sustainable energy system by funding the research and development of independent inventors.
Teslacoin is the cryptocurrency based on the new blockchain technology birthed as an ode to the often forgotten genius Nikola Tesla. The only objective of the currency born 4 years ago is to help the Free Energy inventors and to achieve that goal they have created TeslaStarter.
“TeslaStarter will go through different phases the first one being crowdfunding worthwhile research”, said Matt from Teslacoin team.
Since the project is in an embryonic state they expect to receive thousands of projects that will be reviewed by Teslacoin team, and the committee that will be composed of Free Energy experts.
“Once the research starts moving forward in big steps and we start seeing working prototypes of products that clearly reduce the cost of producing energy, we do expect to start receiving propositions from teams willing to raise money to start producing the new product in mass scale”, commented Rw from the team.
It’s time to make the world a better place. It’s time that the 4 billion people still without access to electricity still using fuels like wood, charcoal, coal and dung for cooking and heating have access to a cleaner and more effective energy source. It’s time for an environmental clean source of energy.
It’s time for a breakthrough in the energy field. It’s time for Free Energy.
NOTE: This machine was demonstrated at the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference (ESTC) but there was no formal presentation. It was only explained to attendees who were interested enough to ask Peter Lindemann questions about it back in the vendor/demo room. This machine is a very small powered demonstration, but proves the point and kept itself charged up all weekend while running a motor/generator. This EXACT circuit from 100 years ago is the foundation for several well-known circuits that have been taught by John Bedini and others over the years – you are being handed the origin of where much of it came from.
Between 1915 and 1918, Carlos F. Benitez was issued 4 British Patents on a “System for the Generation of Electric Currents.” It was the early days of the “electrical era” and many experimenters were claiming new ways to produce useful electrical effects. But this was different. Benitez was claiming to be able to run light bulbs and motors from batteries that never needed to be re-charged from a conventional, external source.
By this time, the Laws of Thermodynamics had become widely taught, and so most electrical engineers did not take these claims seriously. Even today, 99% of scientists and engineers believe this is impossible, under any circumstances.
Here’s why: Classic electrical theory assumes that when a load is operated in the manner shown here, the load RL receives ½ of the power provided by the 12 volt supply, and the 6 volt battery wired in reverse receives the other half as a charging effect. Since the battery being charged only receives ½ of the energy supplied by the source, rotating the batteries back and forth runs them all down in a conventional manner.
So, it is curious to find this quote in one of Benitez’s Patents:
“Obviously the current furnished by the discharge of battery 1-2 alone, would produce a smaller charge in batteries 3-4, if some extra energy were not added to the normal output of said battery 1-2. With this object in view any of the known methods for the generation of high frequency currents, as well as those described in the aforementioned English Patents, can be employed in conjunction with said batteries, in order to provide that complementary energy, and in this manner it is always possible to charge and discharge alternately each battery from one to the other, maintaining constant a storage of electricity and producing furthermore an excess of electrical energy.”
On the Patents, Benitez is referred to as a civil engineer, living in Guadalajara, Mexico. So, while he may not have been earning his living in the electrical sciences, he certainly was familiar with both classic electrical theory and the benefits of his discoveries!
For any honest student, the questions become: Was Benitez mistaken, or did he discover something important? And if so, HOW is this possible??
Benitez was issued 4 Patents, and each one describes a different circuitry and method to accomplish the objects of the invention, which included running external loads AND returning the electrical source to its initial state of charge simultaneously. Since there was no dispute about how much energy was being dissipated by running the loads, the following conclusion may be drawn:
Benitez discovered that it was possible to return a battery to a higher energy state with fewer watt-hours delivered to it than classic electrical theory would predict, as long as that energy was applied to the battery under the correct conditions and in the proper manner.
Today, we would describe this as the ability to charge a battery at a COP > 1.
As John Bedini always said, the “gain” showed up in the battery. The circuits themselves always operated at an efficiency below 100%.
If we assume that in the circuits that had two banks of batteries in them, the charging batteries were receiving about ½ of the energy provided by the run batteries, then the circuitry had to overcome the loss of running the loads and the loss of running the circuitry itself. In this instance, the system would have to be able to produce a charging effect in the receiving batteries equal to 2.2 times the watt-hours provided, or a charging COP > 2.2 for the system to self-sustain indefinitely.
So, the GOAL for an operating system is to attain a battery charging efficiency with a COP > 2.2!
That said, there are other ways to accomplish the goals of the invention, but “super-efficient” battery charging is definitely one of the ways. For students familiar with the work of John Bedini, this method is the best documented and published on, as well.
NOTE: This presentation gives you the EXACT schematic to replicate Peter Lindemann’s circuit that he demonstrated at the 2018 ESTC, operating theory, supporting diagrams and complete explanations of how to operate it. Also, there are multiple URL shortcuts inside the zip file that are highly relevant to this technology. Some are to other presentations and some are to specific discussions at Energetic Forum.
This presentation starts with Jeane Manning who has the pulse of free energy technologies across the globe beyond most.
She will be sharing the basics of what the Aether is, the goal of cheap, clean energy available everywhere, why you don’t have to wait for exotic technologies and what path we are to take with this kind of abundance.
Some specific technologies are reviewed such as Tewari’s Homopolar Generator tested at 238%, an electric car that recharged itself in some tests in 2016, a water fuel technology that uses about 97% water and a small amount of fuel and it only requires about 170 milliamps at 24 volts, a few plasma technologies and the latest in LENR (cold fusion), and others.
Get 25% off for a limited with with this coupon code: DANCING25
There is an exciting mention of a new book Jeane is co-authoring with Susan Manewich called Hidden Energy, which will be released in the fall of 2018!
Susan continues the presentation with another approach on the Aether that is a bit different from Jeane’s and it quite a match. Something very interesting and powerful is the data she shares from a relatively new study that has been ongoing for some time relating to the “Science of Consciousness and Contact.”
If you’ve ever wondered if spirit can influence inventors, you’re in for a surprise that is backed by multiple, highly-credentialed PhDs. You’ll also learn how the balance of Yin & Yang are crucial to breakthroughs and a serious update on the grassroots movement to support these technologies.
Some of these topics are highly controversial, but the data is insurmountable and is presented in a way that is balanced and objective. Susan worked with the late Dr. John Mack and she shares some of her experiences working in this most interesting field.
What does a member of The Monroe Institute, a former head of the US Psychotronics Association, a former Harvard Professor of Astrophysics and editor of the Journal of Cosmology and the late Dr. Edgar Mitchell have in common? Susan Manewich was intimately involved in organizing the data that they all collected based on surveys taken by thousands of people. By analyzing the data, a very revealing picture comes into view and it appears there is non-human intelligence that has been influencing developers of breakthrough technologies.
Susan also shares a never-before-seen interview with the late Guy Obolensky relating to the power of the mind. She was fortunate to have spent some time with him in his final days.
Towards the end of the presentation, Susan covers a very important topic on moral responsibility with free energy technologies as they are sacred and should be treated as such. A business model is shared that anyone can use and takes the above concept into consideration.
There are a fair amount of questions at the end that bring up many important points discussed throughout this presentation.
The Homopolar Generator has always been known to be able to deliver electricity without bogging down the prime mover and Faraday knew this 150 years ago!
Normal generators create a back-torque against the prime mover because of Lenz’s Law, which can be explained as an electromagnetic equal and opposite reaction, but this is completely circumvented in the Homopolar Generators.
Get 25% off for a limited time with this coupon code: RLG25
Bruce DePalma simplified and advanced this concept with his invention known as the N-Machine, which is a simple spinning permanent magnet or electromagnetic by tapping the shaft and the outer perimeter of the rotating magnet. Keep in mind this all works without any coils whatsoever! This is completely different from normal electromagnetic generators.
Later on Adam Trombly made improvements to Bruce DePalma’s methods and when he filed for a patent, the Pentagon served him with a gag order because they themselves apparently had been working on similar technology and many of you know the rest of the story. What they didn’t know was that the patent was also filed in Europe and somehow Paramahamsa Tewari who headed up India’s Nuclear Power Corporation (a really big deal in India) got his hands on the info.
Mr. Tewari worked on replicating Mr. Trombly’s work. So the story goes – Mr. Tewari measured how much water could be electrolyzed with a certain amount of electricity. However, when that same electricity powered the Tewari Reactionless Generator (RLG), the output electrolyzed water and he wound up with several times more freed up hydrogen. This defeated Faraday’s Law of Electrolysis by a few hundred percent and this led to more advancements and innovations on the RLG technology.
Over the years, Mr. Paramahamsa Tewari had continued working on his RLG machine and it has become one of the most tested free energy devices in the world showing at least 238% more electricity coming out of it than going in. This has been tested by very qualified individuals and organizations connected to various companies and universities and the goal is to get this out to the world to help solve the energy problem.
Unfortunately, Mr. Tewari passed away toward the end of 2017 but thankfully, his son Anupam Tewari is committed to keeping his father’s legacy alive and he was gracious enough to come to the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference to present on his father’s work.
This presentation serves as a perfect starting point for anyone who is not familiar with the Tewari RLG, where it comes from and the how Mr. Tewari’s Space Vortex Theory led him to the RLG. Even if you are familiar with the Tewari RLG, there is some history here that many are not aware of and this is coming straight from his son, Anupam, so is authoritative and historically correct.
Electrocuture if over 270 years old and is the science of using high voltage to influence the growth of plants. Plants grow faster, stronger, need less nutrients, pesticides and other additives. Many of these methods are to simulate the Earth’s natural dielectric field that exists between the ground and the ionosphere.
Throughout almost three-hundred years of experiments, field trials, stringent academic research, etc. it has become indisputable that simply using electrostatic potential can drastically alter how plants grow.
Another benefit is that if only high voltage potential is used, current is not flowing so it does energy is not expended on the plant. The only energy loss is in the transformer’s magnetizing losses in order to create the high voltage field. It is a true free-energy technology because the increase in growth in the plants is way more than the energy expended to treat them.
In the last 1980’s and early 1990’s, a large pharmaceutical giant had some scientists on their team that were experimenting with high voltage fields on cells and no matter how the cells were deprived of light, oxygen, nutrients, etc. they continued to thrive as long as they were exposed to high voltage fields.
Get 25% off for a limited time with this coupon code: BIO25
That was the inspiration to move into other experiments where germinating seeds and fertilized fish eggs were treated and something very unexpected happened. Growth not only increased, but the gene expression changed!
When corn seeds were treated, they went on to grow corn that had 5-12 ears of corn per plant!
When fern spores were treated, they grew into a fern that had been extinct for over 1 MILLION YEARS! Top image is the normal fern you seen today. The one below that is what grew after the treatment and fossil evidence shows that the non-micro serrated fern leaves have not been in existence for over 1 Million years!
When wheat was treated, it grew “SUPERWHEAT” that was ready to harvests in 4 weeks rather than 6-7 months!!! The ears were smaller, but there were more per plant. That is about 650% FASTER than normal wheat and it is stronger, more nutrient rich, more disease and pest resistant, etc.
When trout eggs were treated, trout hatched that had “Salmon Hooks”, which had not been seen on this trout for over 150 years since they had been extinct! The one on the left is the normal trout of today. The one on the right is what hatched after eggs from the type on the left were treated. They grew “Salmon Hooks”, grew about 30% bigger, 30% faster, were more disease resistant, were stronger and more aggressive swimmers, etc.
The video excerpt below does not go into this amazing and unusual but highly beneficial effect, but is but a small sample of what is discussed in this presentation.
GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) promises to feed the world, have more disease and pest resistant plants, more abundant harvests, etc. but the empirical evidence is that it is Pandora’s box where none of these benefits are realized long term and they are causing environmental and financial catastrophes all over the world. This is why so many countries are banning GMO seed crops because it isn’t speculation, it is fact that GMO plants are dangerous, cause cancer, among countless other negative effects.
High Voltage seed treatment simply supplies the potential for germinating seeds (or eggs) to access the dormant genetics that are ALREADY inside the DNA. Therefore, no genes are changed, the potential is there to simply access the genetic programming that nature itself has built into the plants.
The potential is for larger and faster harvests with higher quality food, less fertilizers and little to no herbicides or pesticides. And, for the fact that it takes almost no energy to accomplish these amazing benefits, we could very well be on our way to abundant food production for the entire world without crossing the danger zone that GMOs are known for.
Initially, it had been assumed that a simple ratio computed by dividing the output power by the input power would provide a reliable yardstick for motor power efficiency. The basic idea, was sound, for the closer the quotient came to unity, the nearer the motor efficiency would be to 100%. Hence began the so-called “Quest for Unity.”
However, early “electric engines” were very inefficient, probably delivering no more than 30% of the electrical input power to the output shaft. Therefore, it quickly became evident that not all of the applied power was being converted to a mechanical output. Clearly, inefficiencies were involved, and they would have to be accounted for. Until this was complete, the simplified approach to establishing a Factor of Unity could not be realized.
What is remarkable, in the history of motor development, is the curious degree of synergy that seems to have accompanied these early pioneering efforts. Between 1839 and 1850 the British Brew Master James Joule conducted an elegant series of experiments, in which he sought to unify electrical, chemical and thermal phenomena by demonstrating their inter-convertibility and their quantitative equivalence. The results of Joule’s work were published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, with a very impressive title: “On the Mechanical Equivalence of Heat.”
The contributions of Lord Kelvin must be considered next. His paper, “The Dynamical Equivalent of Heat,” published in 1851, contended that energy could be “lost to man irrecoverably; but not lost to the material world”. Thomson was thus the first person to understand that all energy changes involve energy dissipation, and losses.
During the second half of the nineteenth century Kelvin and other scientists, including Clausius, Rankine, Maxwell and, Boltzmann, continued to develop these ideas. Their combined efforts resulted in the establishment of the Science of Thermodynamics; with Conservation of Energy as its First Law and the Dissipation of Energy as its Second Law.
Accordingly, motor researchers were thus made aware of the extreme importance of classifying all known motor losses, and accounting for them with the same degree of accuracy as would be exhibited in the well established science of corporate book-keeping.
Ultimately, such practices would lead to the development of two principle kinds of Efficiency Measurements, both very valuable in all research pertaining to rotating components, but, particularly valuable for developing an understanding of over-unity as a scientific fact. Both efficiency concepts shall be fully explained in this presentation.
Since 1977, the entire field of thermodynamics was upgraded with Ilya Prigogine’s Nobel Prize winning work to include Open System Thermodynamics. In a nutshell, it means that any system that is open with the environment can output more work than the operator has to supply.
Take note that contrary to the conventionally trained academic who is always quick to point out that there can’t be more output than input is making a false argument because that is not what is actually claimed by the inventors of legitimate free energy technologies.
More output than what the operator has to supply is not the same thing as claiming more output than was is going into the system. Obviously, this means there is other input from elsewhere that is not provided by the operator of the system.
It is often said that Prigogine’s work extended thermodynamics to include open systems, but the reality is that it did not extend thermodynamics, it corrected it. The reason for this is very simple – there is no such thing as a closed system and every single system is open.
The deeper reality is that every system is open – some are designed to make use of external input that is separate from the operator’s input and some are designed to only use the operator’s input.
If you have a flashlight and the battery has 10 units of potential energy to light the bulb, when the flashlight is on, minus losses, there will only be 10 units of light or less depending on efficiency. Efficiency is the ratio if TOTAL input vs INTENDED output. This is what is meant by a closed system because it does not utilize free environmental input such as gravity, heat, light, wind, water, etc…
If you take this flashlight and stick it deep into a snow bank that is freezing, the battery will interact with this cold environmental temperature and it will not power the light as long. That is because it is not a closed system after all and easily interacts with the environment outside of itself. If it was a closed system, the battery would continue to power the light irrespective of the environmental temperature that the flashlight is operating in.
Let’s look at an example of a child flying a kite. If the child inputs 10 units of energy and the wind inputs 90 parts energy for a certain period of time, that is 100 parts of energy total input. If 70% of all that input is lost in bad kite design, wind friction on the kite, etc… that means that only 30 units of energy were actual kite flying work accomplished. 100 parts of energy were input and 30 units of INTENDED work were done – that equals 30% efficiency.
That means 30 units of intended work were accomplished but the child only had to input 10 units of work. That is a 300% net GAIN in energy compared to what the operator had to pay for. The ratio of OPERATOR input compared to INTENDED work done is COP or Coefficient of Performance. In this case, the COP is 3.0. COP does not include free environmental input and this is how every heat pump is rated for example.
The kite flying example is a perfectly legitimate free energy system where the operator of the system got way more out of the system than what he had to put in. Again, notice that this is NOT more output than input, but more output than the operator had to contribute – meaning there is indeed extra free environmental input from somewhere.
Watch this excerpt from Peter Lindemann’s Open System Thermodynamics presentation for deeper elaboration on this concept. The next time a skeptic tells you that there can’t be more output than input and that anything like that would violate the laws of thermodynamics, please point them to this post and video because the fact is that they are making an illegitimate argument about something that was never claimed by those who have real free energy technologies.
Please help spread this truth by using the share buttons below!