Category Archives: Overunity

400-600% Overunity Cooling Machine

A university project created a cooling system that creates about 600% more work than it takes to run the system using memory metal.

In this brief article, you’ll learn how something can easily produce way more work than it takes to run it and there are no violations of physics.

Electric heating element heaters are energy hogs for the heat they produce but regardless, they are 100% efficient already. And there is nothing magical or special about a 100% efficient heating system.

Why? Because nichrome or other heating element wire is thought to dissipate or waste all the electrical current that runs through it. That is not even close to being the reality, but that is what conventional science believes so we’ll just entertain that for the purposes of this article and to keep it simple. Normally, heat is considered waste in non-heat systems but if you power a heating element and it “wastes” all the electricity, then it is 100% efficient since the desired work is the heat.

Efficiency is a funny subject because as absolute as it sounds, it is really an objective measurement because efficiency changes depending on your perspective of what kind of work you want.

An incandescent bulb is considered 10% efficient since the desired work is light while 90% of the energy is “wasted” in heat. However, if we want to use those bulbs as heaters, then magically, they would be considered 90% efficient, with 10% wasted as light. But if you want some heat AND light, then the bulb is also magically considered 100% efficient since 100% of what you are using to power the bulb is creating both power and light.

Heat pumps create hundreds of percent more heat/cooling than the electricity required to run them – geothermal, refrigerators, air conditioners, air source heat pump dryers and water heaters, etc. yet, they are less efficient than heating element heaters.

Efficiency is a ratio of TOTAL input to TOTAL output. The heating element produces as much heat as the wattage is provided. It is 100% efficient.

But there is another measurement, COP or Coefficient of Performance, which is the ratio of ONLY WHAT WE PROVIDE on the input compared to the TOTAL output. With a heating element, we provide all the input so total output divided by our input will equal 1.0 or COP of 1.0.

With heat pumps, the story is very different. If it takes 200 watts of electricity to run a compressor to circulate a refrigerant through compressions and expansions cycles (that creates high and low potentials in the system), heat moves for free towards a colder area so the total amount of heat moved in a heat pump can easily be 300, 400, 500, or 600 watts worth of work in an electrical equivalent – for only paying 200 at the wall.

If you put in 200 but you get 600 watts of heat movement, the total desired work is 600 watts worth divided by only your input (not counting free environmental contribution) of 200 watts = 3.0 or COP of 3.0. That is a 300% NET GAIN in total energy (work) produced compared to what you have to pay for. But if you look at all input including environmental input, it will be under 100% since  there are losses. That is how you can have a system that produced hundreds of percent more work compared to what you pay for although it will still be 100% efficient of less.

The cooling system methodology created by a team led by Professors Stefan Seelecke and Andreas Schütze at Saarland University is technically not new in concept, but it is the best example of taking advantage of an interesting memory metal called Nitinol and it’s known effects of soaking up heat while it gets bent and releasing the heat when it straightens out.

The cooling system is made of a cylindrical chamber with a rotor that has nitinol metal strings running along the length. There is a cam system that flexes the wire as it rotates for 1/2 the revolution. During this 1/2, the wires soak up heat in that compartment, which cools the compartment down. When the wires goes into the other side of the chamber, they are allowed to straighten up and they release a lot of heat, which heats up that compartment.

There is air moving through the devices to move both the hot and cold air. The claims from the university is that it is about twice as efficient as a heat pump. As you know from the examples above that a heat pump could have a COP of 2.0 or 3.0 easily. That means that this new Nitinol cooling device would have a COP of 4.0-6.0 or 400-600% more work done than the motor takes to rotate the cylinder!

Although the recent buzz has been talking about this latest development as if it is new, but the university has been at this project for several years. Read this to see where their thought process came from as well as their funding.

It also has this graphic that illustrates a bit of how it works –  this is not shown in any of the recent media releases.

Here is a PDF of the German patent:

Here is the PDF with a low quality translation to English – good enough to understand what is going on:

Who will be the first to replicate the claims and post their results in

For more info on Nitinol, go here: Nitinol

To learn how open systems are permissible by the laws of physics and that systems CAN and DO produce more work than it requires from the operator by getting these two presentations:

Hacking the Aether by Aaron Murakami:

Open System Thermodynamics by Peter Lindemann:

Share this article with your friends using the links below – let’s get some replications going!

6000% Overunity Cylindrical Sail Technology

The cylindrical sails you see in the picture above go back 100 years and were invented by a German Engineered Anton Flettner are are based on the Magnus Effect.

The Magnus Effect is where air flow over a round object will have an uneven flow over the shape so that there is a faster flow on one side than the other and similar to the Bernoulli Effect that allows an airplane to fly, the Magnus Effect can produce an asymmetrical thrust.

Here is an animated Gif showing how it works:

For this effect to work on a ship, electricity is used to rotate these cylinders and as the wind blows past it, a unidirectional thrust is created that helps to propel the ship thereby reducing it’s fuel consumption.

Here is the claim: “The 240 metre-long Maersk tanker will be retrofitted with two modernised versions of the Flettner rotor that are 30 metres tall and five metres in diameter. In favourable wind conditions, each sail can produce the equivalent of 3MW of power using only 50kW of electricity. Norsepower expect to reduce average fuel consumption on typical global shipping routes by 7% to 10%, equivalent to about 1,000 tonnes of fuel a year.”

That’s not a misprint – 3 MEGA WATTS of power is created using only 50 KILOWATTS – that is a COP of 60 times or 6,000% gain compared to what the operators of the ship have to input. Of course, none of this violates any laws of physics since it is an open system and the wind is free environmental input, which is simply being leveraged from very little input.

Congratulations to Norsepower for being open about what it is able to accomplish and to Maersk for allowing this to be implemented on a tanker.

Full story is here:

Geoffrey Miller to Present on World’s Largest Newman Motor

At the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference, Geoffrey Miller will be presenting on a massive Newman Motor that he recently built. He’ll also be disclosing a very * RARE * device invented by Joseph Newman that most Newman fans have never heard of. There will be a demo of this device and all details necessary to replicate it will given!

There are only 150 seats available for the 2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference and they’re going to be sold out months before the conference – register and get your tickets now: 2019 Energy Conference


Here are the details: NEWMAN’S 10,000 LBS MOTOR IN 2019 & DEMONSTRATION AND EXCLUSIVE FULL DISCLOSURE OF RARE NEWMAN DEVICE – The 2019 talk will be on the NEW 10,000 lbs Joseph Newman Motor built by Geoffrey S. Miller at Energybat Labs. In 2017, he gave a talk about the Newman Motor and a small demo of the motor. This year, Geoffrey Miller will go into a whole new level with the new 10,000 lbs motor. The talk outline is below.

1. History of Newman’s big motors.
2. Who maid the new 10,000 lb. motor
3. Why make a 10,000 lb. motor?
4. What it takes to make a motor this size.
5. What the motor will do.
6. All parts of the motor.
7. All motor data.
8. Power in & Power out.
9. Motor running parts of the lab.
10. Videos of the motor running.
11. Hand out data.
12. Q & A session.
13. A live demo will follow the talk about a Newman device.

It is recommended that you get a copy of Geoffrey Miller’s presentation from the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference, which will lay the foundation for the upcoming talk: NEWMAN MOTOR DISCLOSURE

Dr. Ronald Stiffler – Thank you!

Dr. Stiffler - Spacial Energy Coherence (SEC)
Dr. Stiffler – Spacial Energy Coherence (SEC)

Dr. Ronald Stiffler was a very passionate researcher who loved to teach and share his work. He was known for his work with circuits that he dubbed SEC or “Spacial Energy Coherence“, which came in all shapes and sizes and they powered LED arrays as well as creating various forms of hydrogen gas from water – but they also had other applications.

Over the years, we corresponded mostly outside of Energetic Forum where he contributed much of his work and due to some health challenges, he was unable to be as active as he wanted to be.

Unfortunately, I just learned that he passed on last November 2018 in Humble, Texas. At one time, he actually lived in Cheney, Washington, which was only 20 minutes from my home in Spokane, Washington.

You can find some of his work at the following links – Dr. Stiffler has 950 posts in

There are more threads he posted in – some he started and many are discussions started by others. I left out threads that dealt with end-of-the-world scenarios, which Dr. Stiffler was deeply concerned about – the downfall of America caused by the Globalists. He was very open about it and shared his opinions openly in the forum.

You can find an archive of two of his old sites here:*/*/

You can find a little over 160 videos he posted on his work that are still available on YouTube here:

Thank you Ron for all your contributions – it was an honor to know you!

Aaron Murakami Interview by Greg Carlwood of Higherside Chats

Here is an interview of me by Greg Carlwood of Higherside Chats, a popular online podcast. The topic focuses on concepts from my presentation Hacking the Ather, which I gave at last year’s 2017 ESTC. This interview was on October 12, 2018.

Hacking the Aether is a simplified Unified Field Model that shows in a very simple way that any relativistic effects are caused by the aether, how the aether has been proven by Dayton Miller and Einstein admitted he had no confidence in his own work anymore, an interferometer experiment that shows the aether is moving from above towards the downward direction causing a gravitational push and many other concepts that are seamlessly tied together.

Hacking the Aether is available here:

Listen to the interview on YouTube below or download the free mp3 here:

Self-Recharging Battery Supply of Carlos F. Benitez by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.

The Self-Recharging Battery Supply of Carlos F. Benitez by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.
The Self-Recharging Battery Supply of Carlos F. Benitez by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.

NOTE: This machine was demonstrated at the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference (ESTC) but there was no formal presentation. It was only explained to attendees who were interested enough to ask Peter Lindemann questions about it back in the vendor/demo room. This machine is a very small powered demonstration, but proves the point and kept itself charged up all weekend while running a motor/generator. This EXACT circuit from 100 years ago is the foundation for several well-known circuits that have been taught by John Bedini and others over the years – you are being handed the origin of where much of it came from.

Between 1915 and 1918, Carlos F. Benitez was issued 4 British Patents on a “System for the Generation of Electric Currents.” It was the early days of the “electrical era” and many experimenters were claiming new ways to produce useful electrical effects. But this was different. Benitez was claiming to be able to run light bulbs and motors from batteries that never needed to be re-charged from a conventional, external source.

By this time, the Laws of Thermodynamics had become widely taught, and so most electrical engineers did not take these claims seriously. Even today, 99% of scientists and engineers believe this is impossible, under any circumstances.

Here’s why: Classic electrical theory assumes that when a load is operated in the manner shown here, the load RL receives ½ of the power provided by the 12 volt supply, and the 6 volt battery wired in reverse receives the other half as a charging effect. Since the battery being charged only receives ½ of the energy supplied by the source, rotating the batteries back and forth runs them all down in a conventional manner.

Get your copy now:

So, it is curious to find this quote in one of Benitez’s Patents:

“Obviously the current furnished by the discharge of battery 1-2 alone, would produce a smaller charge in batteries 3-4, if some extra energy were not added to the normal output of said battery 1-2. With this object in view any of the known methods for the generation of high frequency currents, as well as those described in the aforementioned English Patents, can be employed in conjunction with said batteries, in order to provide that complementary energy, and in this manner it is always possible to charge and discharge alternately each battery from one to the other, maintaining constant a storage of electricity and producing furthermore an excess of electrical energy.”

On the Patents, Benitez is referred to as a civil engineer, living in Guadalajara, Mexico. So, while he may not have been earning his living in the electrical sciences, he certainly was familiar with both classic electrical theory and the benefits of his discoveries!

For any honest student, the questions become: Was Benitez mistaken, or did he discover something important? And if so, HOW is this possible??

Benitez was issued 4 Patents, and each one describes a different circuitry and method to accomplish the objects of the invention, which included running external loads AND returning the electrical source to its initial state of charge simultaneously. Since there was no dispute about how much energy was being dissipated by running the loads, the following conclusion may be drawn:

Benitez discovered that it was possible to return a battery to a higher energy state with fewer watt-hours delivered to it than classic electrical theory would predict, as long as that energy was applied to the battery under the correct conditions and in the proper manner.

Today, we would describe this as the ability to charge a battery at a COP > 1.

As John Bedini always said, the “gain” showed up in the battery. The circuits themselves always operated at an efficiency below 100%.

If we assume that in the circuits that had two banks of batteries in them, the charging batteries were receiving about ½ of the energy provided by the run batteries, then the circuitry had to overcome the loss of running the loads and the loss of running the circuitry itself. In this instance, the system would have to be able to produce a charging effect in the receiving batteries equal to 2.2 times the watt-hours provided, or a charging COP > 2.2 for the system to self-sustain indefinitely.

So, the GOAL for an operating system is to attain a battery charging efficiency with a COP > 2.2!

That said, there are other ways to accomplish the goals of the invention, but “super-efficient” battery charging is definitely one of the ways. For students familiar with the work of John Bedini, this method is the best documented and published on, as well.

NOTE: This presentation gives you the EXACT schematic to replicate Peter Lindemann’s circuit that he demonstrated at the 2018 ESTC, operating theory, supporting diagrams and complete explanations of how to operate it. Also, there are multiple URL shortcuts inside the zip file that are highly relevant to this technology. Some are to other presentations and some are to specific discussions at Energetic Forum.

Get your copy now:

Tewari Reactionless Generator (RLG) by Anupam Tewari

The Homopolar Generator has always been known to be able to deliver electricity without bogging down the prime mover and Faraday knew this 150 years ago!

Normal generators create a back-torque against the prime mover because of Lenz’s Law, which can be explained as an electromagnetic equal and opposite reaction, but this is completely circumvented in the Homopolar Generators.

Get your copy here:

Get 25% off for a limited time with this coupon code: RLG25

Bruce DePalma simplified and advanced this concept with his invention known as the N-Machine, which is a simple spinning permanent magnet or electromagnetic by tapping the shaft and the outer perimeter of the rotating magnet. Keep in mind this all works without any coils whatsoever! This is completely different from normal electromagnetic generators.

Later on Adam Trombly made improvements to Bruce DePalma’s methods and when he filed for a patent, the Pentagon served him with a gag order because they themselves apparently had been working on similar technology and many of you know the rest of the story. What they didn’t know was that the patent was also filed in Europe and somehow Paramahamsa Tewari who headed up India’s Nuclear Power Corporation (a really big deal in India) got his hands on the info.

Mr. Tewari worked on replicating Mr. Trombly’s work. So the story goes – Mr. Tewari measured how much water could be electrolyzed with a certain amount of electricity. However, when that same electricity powered the Tewari Reactionless Generator (RLG), the output electrolyzed water and he wound up with several times more freed up hydrogen. This defeated Faraday’s Law of Electrolysis by a few hundred percent and this led to more advancements and innovations on the RLG technology.

Over the years, Mr. Paramahamsa Tewari had continued working on his RLG machine and it has become one of the most tested free energy devices in the world showing at least 238% more electricity coming out of it than going in. This has been tested by very qualified individuals and organizations connected to various companies and universities and the goal is to get this out to the world to help solve the energy problem.

Unfortunately, Mr. Tewari passed away toward the end of 2017 but thankfully, his son Anupam Tewari is committed to keeping his father’s legacy alive and he was gracious enough to come to the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference to present on his father’s work.

This presentation serves as a perfect starting point for anyone who is not familiar with the Tewari RLG, where it comes from and the how Mr. Tewari’s Space Vortex Theory led him to the RLG. Even if you are familiar with the Tewari RLG, there is some history here that many are not aware of and this is coming straight from his son, Anupam, so is authoritative and historically correct.

Get your copy here:

Get 25% off for a limited time with this coupon code: RLG25

The Meaning of Unity in Energy Conversion Systems by Jim Murray

The Meaning of Unity in Energy Conversion Systems by Jim Murray
The Meaning of Unity in Energy Conversion Systems by Jim Murray

Initially, it had been assumed that a simple ratio computed by dividing the output power by the input power would provide a reliable yardstick for motor power efficiency. The basic idea, was sound, for the closer the quotient came to unity, the nearer the motor efficiency would be to 100%. Hence began the so-called “Quest for Unity.”

However, early “electric engines” were very inefficient, probably delivering no more than 30% of the electrical input power to the output shaft. Therefore, it quickly became evident that not all of the applied power was being converted to a mechanical output. Clearly, inefficiencies were involved, and they would have to be accounted for. Until this was complete, the simplified approach to establishing a Factor of Unity could not be realized.

What is remarkable, in the history of motor development, is the curious degree of synergy that seems to have accompanied these early pioneering efforts. Between 1839 and 1850 the British Brew Master James Joule conducted an elegant series of experiments, in which he sought to unify electrical, chemical and thermal phenomena by demonstrating their inter-convertibility and their quantitative equivalence. The results of Joule’s work were published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, with a very impressive title: “On the Mechanical Equivalence of Heat.”

The contributions of Lord Kelvin must be considered next. His paper, “The Dynamical Equivalent of Heat,” published in 1851, contended that energy could be “lost to man irrecoverably; but not lost to the material world”. Thomson was thus the first person to understand that all energy changes involve energy dissipation, and losses.

During the second half of the nineteenth century Kelvin and other scientists, including Clausius, Rankine, Maxwell and, Boltzmann, continued to develop these ideas. Their combined efforts resulted in the establishment of the Science of Thermodynamics; with Conservation of Energy as its First Law and the Dissipation of Energy as its Second Law.

Accordingly, motor researchers were thus made aware of the extreme importance of classifying all known motor losses, and accounting for them with the same degree of accuracy as would be exhibited in the well established science of corporate book-keeping.

Ultimately, such practices would lead to the development of two principle kinds of Efficiency Measurements, both very valuable in all research pertaining to rotating components, but, particularly valuable for developing an understanding of over-unity as a scientific fact. Both efficiency concepts shall be fully explained in this presentation.

To get your copy now, go here: The Meaning of Unity in Energy Conversion Systems

Use this coupon to receive 25% off for a limited time: UNITY25

2018-03-04 Jim Murray Live

Jim Murray shares his insights into segregated load analysis, looping overunity systems and other related topics.

Jim Murray will be presenting at the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference. Out of 150 seats, only 64 are available so register and get your tickets while you can –

Use this coupon code to receive a 25% discount on any of Jim Murray’s presentations (this code works on Paul Babcock’s presentations too, which you can find on!) Discount code expires March 31, 2018: JIMPAUL25

Here are some of Jim’s presentations…

Tesla’s Hidden Discoveries:

Dynaflux Alternator:

Fundamentals of the Transforming Generator:

The Secrets of Tesla’s Power Magnification:

Two Overunity Technologies by Paul LaViolette

Dr. Paul LaViolette is one of the leading authorities on antigravity technologies and has worked with some of the most advanced researchers in the field. He is the founder of the Starburst Foundation and has authored many papers and books including the popular Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion.

As a conventionally trained scientist, he was employed by the US Patent Office and was wrongfully terminated. He fought back and had the anti-discriminatory laws changed so that they could no longer fire anyone for their scientific beliefs. He is a champion for free thought and has certainly proved this by his development of Sub Quantum Kinetics – SQK – a model that appears to be able to answer many of the underlying mechanisms of seemingly complex subjects.

Dr. LaViolette beings with a discussion on the Sun Cell developed by Black Light Power Corp., a technology that could one day power and heat our home. It is able to capture energy released in water from the transition of hydrogen atom orbital electrons to subground energy states. While this behavior is not anticipated by standard quantum theory, the novel physics methdology of subquantum kinetics (SQK) does allow this.

At the same time SQK can explain the operation of the Nassikas superconducting magnetic thruster, a device which per unit thrust weight provides over 1000 times more thrust than NASA’s NSTAR ion thruster with no energy consumption. The Nassikas thruster can get us to the stars.

Two Overunity Technologies by Dr. Paul LaVioletteTwo Overunity Technologies by Dr. Paul LaViolette
Two Overunity Technologies by Dr. Paul LaViolette