Category Archives: Propulsion

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference Panel Discussion 2

2018 ESTC Panel Discussion #2 with Dr. Charles Bagley, Yaro Stanchak, John Petersen, Aaron Murakami, Eric Dollard, David Alzofon, Ken Wheeler.

For videos from this conference, they will be posted at http://emediapress.com

Gravity Control with Present Technology by David Alzofon

Gravity Control with Present Technology by David Alzofon
Gravity Control with Present Technology by David Alzofon

If you’re technically oriented, particularly if you have a background in electrical engineering, you’ll find gravity control easy to understand. And if you’re familiar with the rocky history of alternative energy development, you will quickly see that gravity control is a gateway technology — not only for easy access to space and a complete overhaul of terrestrial transportation — but for the liberation of free energy technologies. And yet, contrary to expectations, it is likely to be embraced by major corporate interests, simply because it provides a way out of their current problems and into even greater profits in the future. In fact, the profit potential of gravity control absolutely dwarfs anything powering today’s economy.

Get your copy here: http://emediapress.com/davidalzofon/gravitycontrol/

Get 25% off with this coupon code for a limited time: GRAVITY25

The technology is easy to understand. It begins with a new, physical model of the origin of the gravitational force, which is not provided by Einstein’s general theory of relativity. Dr. Alzofon’s model, which meets all the rigorous requirements of a scientific theory, is based on his experience under professors such as J. Robert Oppenheimer, David Bohm, Victor Lenzen, and Griffith C. Evans at Cal Berkeley from 1942 to 1956, as well as experimental work he conducted at the cyclotron (published in Physical Review). In 1960, an Air Force survey of gravitation research worldwide since the time of Newton concluded that Alzofon’s theory was the only one that had a prayer of a technological application (bibliography in Gravity Control with Present Technology). The only one.

Gravity control is easily derived from the model of the gravitational force. The technology resembles a well-known cryogenic process, but operates on a subatomic level on random electrodynamic processes held to be responsible for gravitation. Essentially, it “freezes” (lowers the energy level) of the gravitational field through cyclic application of microwave pulses, which orients the heavy nuclei of paramagnetic materials, such as aluminum. In combination with a constant magnetic field, microwave impulses induce a pumping action that is repeated thousands of times per second, depleting the energy in the gravitational field more and more until a “cascade point” is reached and gravity and inertia vanish almost altogether (the endpoint is comparable to 1/10th of 1 degree Kelvin, by analogy). Since the pumping effects are cumulative, the total energy required to make a vehicle weightless and inertia free is very small (exact calculations are given in the book).

The chart below was computer-generated during the 1994 experiment. The vertical axis tracks weight and the horizontal axis tracks time. The weight began to plummet the moment the system was switched on.

Initially we see a slight spike in weight. Then the weight drops. As the cycle repeats, the weight spikes again slightly, but the loss deepens even further after the second spike. This descending saw-tooth pattern was highly significant, as it was predicted in Dr. Alzofon’s model of gravity control before the apparatus was ever turned on. When the power to the system is cut, the weight of the test object slowly and smoothly returns to normal. This occurs as the Earth’s gravitational field, temporarily held in abeyance, returns to disorient the electrodynamic activity surrounding the nuclei of the sample. As you can see, the weight loss is cumulative, not instantaneous. This is the beauty of the technology, because it means a low power investment applied cyclically can be leveraged into a tremendous weight loss in a relatively short time.

Get your copy here: http://emediapress.com/davidalzofon/gravitycontrol/

Get 25% off with this coupon code for a limited time: GRAVITY25

Think of the implications: Weightless craft will be able to exit the Earth’s gravitational field at any speed, even as slowly as a weather balloon, with very little fuel expenditure. Traditional rocketry, with all of its limitations and drawbacks, flies out the window. This means the conquest of the space frontier and a new frontier for economic development. The same technology can be applied to terrestrial transportation. How would you like to commute to work at Mach 2, with no traffic jams or stoplights? Since inertia is also removed by gravity control, vehicles will be able to stop and start instantaneously, as well as turn on a dime (no g force). And, as millions of people, rather than a few lonely astronauts or well-heeled billionaires, share the experience of viewing the Earth from space, what will happen to our perception of ourselves and our place in the cosmos?

Keep in mind that the technology is not theoretical: it was experimentally proven in 1994. After that, Dr. Alzofon kept it a closely guarded secret until his death in 2012. Following his father’s death, David Alzofon — who had watched while the technology languished in obscurity ever since 1981, the date of his father’s full-disclosure lecture in Colorado Springs — decided the time for waiting was over. Humanity could not endure another ten years of the current paradigm, with its built-in spiral of doom, when a new technology was already available that would bring about the dawn of a new age. He correctly saw that there was nothing to fear from the new technology: It would simply evolve on a course parallel to the development of aerodynamic flight, and like aerodynamic flight, it would confer enormous benefits, but on a much, much larger scale. Weaponization? There is nothing destructive about gravity control. Liberating? Yes. Domineering? Not when it is developed equally on all sides.

So, abandoning any thought of personal gain, he decided to do all he could to publicize the technology. He opened the books on the 1994 experiment in hopes of encouraging replications of the experiment with improved digital equipment by responsible scientists and entrepreneurs, thereby ensuring its dissemination into the mainstream of science and engineering. Already, there are signs that his strategy is working. And, as he amply demonstrates in the book, if the technology works, the moneymaking opportunities are astronomical. Dr. Alzofon assessed the value of his invention as equal to the combine GDP of all the industrial nations on earth within ten years of its debut. Control of climate change is just a side benefit.

Since the dawn of history, gravity and inertia have been regarded as more inevitable than death or taxes. The discovery of gravity control is on a par with the discovery of fire or the wheel. It is not only vitally important for the advancement of science, but for the evolution of mankind, as it opens the door to the final frontier: space.

Get your copy here: http://emediapress.com/davidalzofon/gravitycontrol/

Get 25% off with this coupon code for a limited time: GRAVITY25

Nassikas Superconducting Thruster V2

About 6 months ago, the EM Thruster was making the news and it was a reaction-less thruster – meaning it violates Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion. This was even discussed on the NASA website. You can read about it here: http://emediapress.com/2015/11/12/em-space-drive-apparently-violates-newtons-3rd-law/

Dr. Athanassios Nassikas has filed a patent for another reaction-less thruster, but this one apparently doesn’t require any other input other than a permanent magnet. Also, the amount of thrust appears to be way more than any other reaction-less thruster. It is estimated from the tests that the weight to thrust ratio is 9 TIMES GREATER than an engine on a Space Shuttle.

Keep in mind that this is still in the early developmental phase but it is something that you can help to support if you feel it is a worthy cause. Check out this video narrated by Dr. Paul LaViolette:

If you want to help support this project, go here: https://igg.me/at/levitation-thruster/x/2343214

EM Space Drive Apparently Violates Newton’s 3rd Law

Isaac Newton
Isaac Newton

Conventional physics is in alignment with Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion where every action is supposed to have an equal and opposite reaction. However, that is a misunderstanding of natural phenomena because the reality is that the combined forces are divided between two reference points and that is a huge difference in the interpretation of nature. However that may be, this still does not permit a propulsion system with no reaction at all.

An important distinction is that there actually are mechanical systems, which take a reaction but turn it around to help push the machine/device/system in the forward direction. That means that the reaction is not opposing anything and is actually used to become additive to the original forward motion that created it to begin with. That means more forward work is accomplished compared to the work that was input and this violates no laws of physics contrary to conventional belief. Take note that there still is a reaction, but it does not buck the forward intended motion.

Veljko 2-Stage Mechanical Oscillator
Veljko 2-Stage Mechanical Oscillator

Examples of these include Veljko’s 2 Stage Mechanical Oscillator, Fernando Sixto Ramos Solano’s Force Multiplier System, William F. Skinner’s 1939 Gravity Power Machine and others. These systems have many things in common, which include the fact that there is a reaction in the system that is cleverly manipulated into doing forward work for the system. No laws of physics are violated and it has nothing to do with perpetual motion.

Now, lets get to systems that have no apparent reaction whatsoever. We’re not talking about using reactive power to do forward work, we’re taking about a system that appears to have no reaction at all.

Recently in the news, a new space propulsion drive is being admitted by NASA to have no reaction and it is ruffling some feather. An astrophysicist told Space.com, “The reason it’s controversial is, it violates Newton’s Third Law.”

EmDrive
EmDrive

The concept was invented by Roger Shawyer who calls it an EmDrive. Microwaves are bounced around inside a conical shaped container and without any propellant, a small amount of thrust is created. This has been verified by researchers at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

The thrust produced is extremely small but nevertheless, it works and of course needs to be researched and developed further. It is always a good sign when we see conventionally trained academics and engineers admitting that something is doing the “impossible” and is apparently violating the coveted laws of physics.

You can read more about this here: http://www.space.com/29363-impossible-em-drive-space-engine-nasa.html

The paper by NASA on this project is here: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052 – a link to the PDF is on this page.

It seems that the conical shape is causing a simple potential difference between the narrow and wide end giving it somewhat of an asymmetrical dipole effect that appears to be related to a century old discovery.

A reaction-less space drive has was invented and proven out in the 1920s – almost 100 years ago!

Thomas Townsend Brown developed an interesting propulsion system using capacitors charged to a high voltage. When charged up, the capacitor moves through space in the direction of the positive terminal. Here is a short excerpt from his British Patent #300,311, A Method of & an Apparatus or Machine for Producing Force or Motion:

The invention also relates to machines or apparatus requiring electrical energy that control or influence the gravitational field or the energy of gravitation; also to machines or apparatus requiring electrical energy that exhibit a linear force or motion which is believed to be independent of all frames of reference save that which is at rest relative to the universe taken as a whole, and said linear force or motion is furthermore believed to have no equal and opposite reaction that can be observed by any method commonly known and accepted by the physical science to date.

This reaction-less propulsion system from he 1920s is not just theoretical, it demonstrates what is known as the Biefeld-Brown Effect, which is the basis for a field known as “Electrogravitics.”

Ten years ago when I first wrote The Quantum Key, my layman’s Aetheric Unified Model predicted the proper direction of movement in this manner without having ever heard of the Bifeld-Brown Effect. Basically, the positive charge of the aetheric source potential is repelled by the high voltage positive at the leading edge of the “craft” and this causes it to be deflected over the shell towards the negative end. Simultaneously, the implied anti or negative charge of the aether pulls on the positive end of the craft and causes it to move along at a negative resistance and this seems to be the obvious reason for no reaction – there simply is no positive resistance it is moving in to. Since the positive aetheric source charge is what causes inertia by imparting an electrostatic repulsion against the protons that make up the mass, inertia is reduced since that which causes it is no longer moving through the atomic matrix of the mass that makes up the craft – it is deflected over it. This appears to be the main principle at play in any asymmetrical thruster that has no reaction.

Anyway, the mainstream sources of information are really mainstream sources of disinformation because it is constantly claimed that the effect is nothing more than ion wind and that the movement is ion propulsion, but it is not. There is a small bit of ion wind, but not even close to being enough to account for the amount of lift or thrust given to an apparatus utilizing the Biefeld-Brown Effect.

The most common is known as a “Lifter” and you can see a very basic one in operation here:

Here is a PDF of a report from the U.S. Army Laboratory stating, “The calculations indicate that ionic wind is at least three orders of magnitude too small to explain the magnitude of the observed force on the capacitor.Force on an Asymmetric Capacitor