Tag: peter lindemann

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Zero Force Motor Part 2 – Hidden Dance by Yaro Stanchak

Zero Force Motor Part 2 - Hidden Dance by Yaro Stanchak
Zero Force Motor Part 2 – Hidden Dance by Yaro Stanchak

At the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference, more revelations are disclosed about the last one year of experiments with the Zero Force Motor.

Within this follow up presentation, you will find all the specs, which should be considered a standard built for more experiments to get start with. It works and has already been proven out by Yaro Stanchak and James McDonald.

Yaro also shares the differences in more detail on attractive vs repulsive mode and how this looks diagrammatically so the viewer can benefit from these findings. A thorough walk-through on the Zero Force Motor’s timing characteristics of the magnet’s geometry in relation to the coil geometry is covered. This is very important and cannot be stated enough – timing is crucial and can make or break your results.

Get your copy now: Zero Force Motor – Hidden Dance

Get 25% off for a limited time with this coupon: ZFM25

Keep in mind this is a developmental process and there are no free energy claims. It is a novel motor with unique aspects that have not been used or exploited in conventional motors and bit by bit, the potential of what this machine is capable of is slowly revealing itself.

Pay close attention to the date in the table presented by Yaro. You may find there is more than meets the eye. And you will definitely see that at certain RPMs, which may indicate some resonant points that you will see the Hidden Dance happening within the machine as Yaro shows on the scope.

There is also a difference in the characteristics of how the motor operates in relation to its waveforms that are measurable if the ZFM is running on a battery compared to a linear current power supply. In other words, there appears to be advantages to running it on a battery compared to a power supply. Professor Robert Haralick during questions points out a very plausible reason for this and that is that when running, the ZFM is producing longitudinal waves that are accepted by the battery(s) but the linear amp power supply cannot.

This would be completely consistent with John Bedini’s experience over the years with experiments on the Bedini SG when running on and charging batteries, which have shown unusual input vs output ratios and most of this disappears when running these machines on conventional power supplies. It has been stated over the years that the battery is very important as part of the open system and once again, these ZFM experiments shown by Yaro seem to indicate the same results.

Here are a few of the subjects that Yaro will show in this presentation:

  • Introduction and Brief Review Of Zero Force Motor Design and Operation
  • ZFM Timing and Firing Duration with Coil Voltages
  • ZFM Operational Characteristics; RPM, Amps & Efficiency
  • Review of O-Scope Wave Forms for Voltage and Amperage
  • Hidden Dance
  • Ron Cole ZFM Variant – LCF or Linear Counter Field

Enough! Time to get back to the next round of ZFM experiments…

Get your copy now: Zero Force Motor – Hidden Dance

Get 25% off for a limited time with this coupon: ZFM25

Posted on by — Leave a comment

2018-05-24 Geoffrey Miller on Missing John Bedini Video

Geoffrey Miller recently shared a few tidbits about the Missing 1984 presentation by John Bedini. Here is the interview with a few pics from the presentation that will give you a glimpse into what is coming out soon!

This is a * MUST HAVE * video that is not only historical and RARE as hen’s teeth, it is highly valuable and the material that John covers is absolutely priceless. You will see John Bedini in a completely unrestrained form unlike anything you have ever seen from him. He holds back on nothing and is completely forward and blunt about each and every claim he makes.

 

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Over 700 Volts from the Kromrey Generator

There have already been a few posts/videos on shorting coils and they’re relationship to the Kromrey Generator. To show the potential, no pun intended, of shorting the Kromrey Generator coils, another video is available.

You can see that over 700 volts AC is available by shorting it’s small generator coils or almost 600 volts DC from the same coils.

Get Peter Lindemann’s presentation on the Kromrey Generator here: https://emediapress.com/shop/bedini-sg/

Posted on by — 1 Comment

Shorted Coils Part 2

First we posted about the Kromrey Generator speeding up when the generator coils are shorting out: http://emediapress.com/2017/12/20/kromrey-generator-speeds-up-when-shorted-out/

Second we posted Shorted Coils Part 1 to get into some of the concepts about this here: http://emediapress.com/2017/12/29/shorted-coils-part-1/

Here is Shorted Coils Part 2, which shows a couple benefits of why you would even want to do it, possibly, in some of your own builds. You wind up with more output from your coils while simultaneously unloading the prime mover. We’ll show a bit more on the Kromrey with a few more experiments in another video soon:

Share this with the buttons below and register at the 2018 Energy Science & Technology conference here: Energy Conference

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Another Self Running System

After all this time, John Bedini’s 3 Battery system or “Splitting the Positive” method is still making waves.

In 2016, Peter Lindemann presented on Bedini SG – Beyond the Advanced Handbook where he presented a larger scale Bedini SG with a 3 Battery rotation system that kept itself charged up all conference long. Learn more here: http://emediapress.com/2016/08/09/new-release-bedini-sg-beyond-the-advanced-handbook-by-peter-lindemann/

This year, RS Stafford presented a low budget low tech method of doing the same thing where he also demonstrated a battery bank that kept itself charged up while producing a lot of work. Learn more here: http://emediapress.com/2017/08/31/poor-mans-split-the-positive-battery-swapper-by-rs-stafford/

Matthew Jones and Dave (Turion) at Energetic Forum have been working on this concept for years starting with the “Tesla Switch” and related circuits and have put countless messages into the forum freely sharing their work with diagrams, videos, pictures and data. Others like Bob French, Wantomake and others have studied this work and have made incredible progress.

This has been going on for years but is coming to the point where it is simply a relatively easy way to build a system that keeps its batteries charged up. And, this is at the point where it is simply undeniable any longer.

There are multiple threads over the years that cover this work, but make sure to check this thread out: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/10610-3-battery-generating-system.html

You can go to the more recent posts over the last couple months (pay close attention to Wantomake’s posts and then go study this thread, which is closed and locked due to disruptions: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/19774-basic-free-energy-device.html

And then study Matthew Jones’ videos on how to modify a scooter motor for the project: https://www.youtube.com/user/mjones7947/videos There are 8 relevant videos there so subscribe to his channel and give his videos a thumbs up to show your appreciation for his sharing!

If you don’t know where to start, grab a drink, put on your seatbelt and read both threads start to finish. It will take you hours, but how much is a self running system worth to you? It works, I know several people who have built this exact system (them) and someone that has even verified their work.

There is more to come, but that should keep you busy for a while. I hope you see the value in this and the implications of what it means.

Posted on by — 3 Comments

Kromrey Generator Speeds Up When Shorted Out

Kromrey Generator
Kromrey Generator

The Kromrey Generator is one of the most interesting generators that has made it to the public. Although it has never been mass produced, enough researchers and developers have built them to demonstrate that it definitely has some anomalous properties. John Bedini is one of those geniuses that has been involved with the Kromrey Generator before most have ever heard of it as well as having built many variations that hold up to the claims of the inventor.

At the 2016 Energy Science & Technology Conference, Peter Lindemann presented a large-scale Bedini SG that ran itself and kept its batteries charged up as well as demonstrating John’s 2 Pole larger Kromrey Generator. In the demonstration, it showed that the input motor drew about 32 watts while charging a battery with 72 watts. That is about twice as much output as what was being supplied to the input. Peter’s presentation that goes into the operation of this machine is available here titled Bedini SG – Beyond the Advanced Handbook – https://emediapress.com/shop/bedini-sg/

On that same website is the third SG book called Bedini SG – The Complete Advanced Handbook and that goes into a lot of the details on the Kromrey Generator as well.

Below is a video where I show a simple video of the machine actually speeding up as the output is shorted – normally, this would create so much counter-torque that it will make it very difficult for the input motor to turn. Instead, it actually climbs 50-60 rpm while the input power actually drops! There is a simple reason for this but there are other anomalous aspects that conventional science cannot explain such as the demonstration results that Peter showed at the conference. The below video also gives a few closeups of the Kromrey Generator that John Bedini built (one of them) as well as an error that I discovered in the Kromrey Generator patent that nobody has ever pointed out until now.

Make sure to register for the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference – you never know what we might show next! Energy Conference

Share this video with your friends with the share buttons below – not everyone has seen a generator that actually unloads the prime mover when it is shorted out! Please understand the significance of this machine is profound. Imagine a gas generator set running and you turn on some lights powered by the generator but the gas engine stays the same RPM. That means that it doesn’t take more electricity to power a load. I still consider this technology in its infancy and there is a lot of room for improvements, which may be coming out in the near future.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Poor Man’s Split the Positive Battery Swapper by RS Stafford

Poor Man's Split the Positive Battery Swapper by RS Stafford
Poor Man’s Split the Positive Battery Swapper by RS Stafford

At last year’s conference, Peter Lindemann demonstrated a Bedini SSG energizer that produced a lot of mechanical work all weekend and the batteries stayed charged up!

It worked beautifully and was done with an automated circuit that rotates the batteries in a certain way but most people do not have the know-how to be able to build that circuit.

At this year’s conference, RS Stafford replicated this battery swapping method with circuit breaks and other common parts from his local hardware store. It’s inexpensive and very, very simple to build. This is the machine that ANYONE can make work if they just follow some simple wiring diagrams and RS’s instructions.

Let me explain the Split the Positive concept… lf I were to ask someone – even someone with a background in electronics or electricity if a light bulb would light up if it were placed between the positives of the batteries as shown to the left, they would say no.

Let’s say they are 1.5 volt AA batteries. The two in series makes 3 volts and the other single battery is 1.5 volts by itself. Well, 3 volts – 1.5 volts in opposition means there is still a voltage potential difference of 1.5 volts between the positives. A LED bulb for example will indeed light up because potential differences are what are important in electricity and NOT polarity.

Here’s an important thing to understand – while the bulb is lit up, the current from the two batteries in series is charging up battery #3. Therefore, if battery #3 is dead, it will charge up as the bulb is lit. When it is charged, it can move to the position of #1 or #1 batteries and one of the batteries #1 or #2 can be placed into the #3 position and it will get charged up while the bulb is lit. So you can see that by constantly rotating these batteries, you actually wind up with way more load powering capability than you would get if you just ran the bulb on a single battery until it’s dead and do that for the other two batteries.

John Bedini came up with this method years ago after studying the concepts in the famous Ed Gray motor, which had a similar process, but with much higher voltages. The above example has been known as Bedini’s 3 Battery system and very few people have ever understood the profound implications of it.

Now when you combine this concept with a highly efficient Bedini Energizer where you can recover a high percentage of what goes into the system in addition to getting some extra electricity from some generator coils that have very low drag, you have the keys to be able to produce mechanical or electrical work while making up for virtually all its own losses. That means you have a simple system that keeps itself charged up and you can create the battery swapping part of the system with parts from your local hardware store!

Our power grid is doomed to crash and you will be at a very strong advantage with what RS is teaching you here in this presentation.

Split the Positive
Split the Positive

Learn more here: https://emediapress.com/shop/poor-mans-split-positive-battery-swapper-system/

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Zero Force Motor by Yaro Stanchak

Zero Force Motor by Yaro Stanchak
Zero Force Motor by Yaro Stanchak

Yaro Stanchak made history at the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference by presenting the background history, John Bedini’s lab notes, and all other details necessary to replicate the Zero Force Motor.

The Zero Force Motor was one of John Bedini’s most coveted technologies and was instrumental in his early development of a magnetic model that influenced his work all the way to recent times.

This is a highly efficient motor that can go high speeds while drawing very little current. It also operates on some interesting principles that have most people scratching their heads.

This presentation is now available so you can have the most comprehensive collection of information on the Zero Force Motor that has ever been assembled.

Zero Force Motor by Yaro Stanchak
Zero Force Motor by Yaro Stanchak

Learn more at: Zero Force Motor

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Al Francoeur – Owner of Ed Gray Motors Interview 2017-05-14

Aaron Murakami, Al Francoeur, Paul Babcock
Aaron Murakami, Al Francoeur, Paul Babcock

Al Francoeur has been involved with energy technologies since the 1980’s and is the inventor of several interference generators that operate with reduced back emf.

He is the owner of several E.V. Gray Motors that were later converted to run conventionally. There are some clues in these motors and an original power supply, which appears to have never been tampered with. Al has found a few clues as to the original operating method and will be sharing his perspective on these aspects of the Ed Gray Motor technology at the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference.

Mark McKay is a researcher that has traveled the country visiting Ed Gray’s family, friends, engineers, etc. and has revealed his historical findings in these presentations: https://emediapress.com/shop/real-history-ed-gray-motor/

Al’s presentation will be a perfect companion to Mark’s presentations and will be released after the upcoming conference.

Come meet Al Francoeur at the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference – there are only 8 seats remaining: http://energyscienceconference.com

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Open System Thermodynamics by Peter Lindemann

Open System Thermodynamics

Get the whole presentation here: https://emediapress.com/shop/open-system-thermodynamics/

Since 1977, the entire field of thermodynamics was upgraded with Ilya Prigogine’s Nobel Prize winning work to include Open System Thermodynamics. In a nutshell, it means that any system that is open with the environment can output more work than the operator has to supply.

Take note that contrary to the conventionally trained academic who is always quick to point out that there can’t be more output than input is making a false argument because that is not what is actually claimed by the inventors of legitimate free energy technologies.

More output than what the operator has to supply is not the same thing as claiming more output than was is going into the system. Obviously, this means there is other input from elsewhere that is not provided by the operator of the system.

It is often said that Prigogine’s work extended thermodynamics to include open systems, but the reality is that it did not extend thermodynamics, it corrected it. The reason for this is very simple – there is no such thing as a closed system and every single system is open.

The deeper reality is that every system is open – some are designed to make use of external input that is separate from the operator’s input and some are designed to only use the operator’s input.

If you have a flashlight and the battery has 10 units of potential energy to light the bulb, when the flashlight is on, minus losses, there will only be 10 units of light or less depending on efficiency. Efficiency is the ratio if TOTAL input vs INTENDED output. This is what is meant by a closed system because it does not utilize free environmental input such as gravity, heat, light, wind, water, etc…

If you take this flashlight and stick it deep into a snow bank that is freezing, the battery will interact with this cold environmental temperature and it will not power the light as long. That is because it is not a closed system after all and easily interacts with the environment outside of itself. If it was a closed system, the battery would continue to power the light irrespective of the environmental temperature that the flashlight is operating in.

Let’s look at an example of a child flying a kite. If the child inputs 10 units of energy and the wind inputs 90 parts energy for a certain period of time, that is 100 parts of energy total input. If 70% of all that input is lost in bad kite design, wind friction on the kite, etc… that means that only 30 units of energy were actual kite flying work accomplished. 100 parts of energy were input and 30 units of INTENDED work were done – that equals 30% efficiency.

That means 30 units of intended work were accomplished but the child only had to input 10 units of work. That is a 300% net GAIN in energy compared to what the operator had to pay for. The ratio of OPERATOR input compared to INTENDED work done is COP or Coefficient of Performance. In this case, the COP is 3.0. COP does not include free environmental input and this is how every heat pump is rated for example.

The kite flying example is a perfectly legitimate free energy system where the operator of the system got way more out of the system than what he had to put in. Again, notice that this is NOT more output than input, but more output than the operator had to contribute – meaning there is indeed extra free environmental input from somewhere.

Watch this excerpt from Peter Lindemann’s Open System Thermodynamics presentation for deeper elaboration on this concept. The next time a skeptic tells you that there can’t be more output than input and that anything like that would violate the laws of thermodynamics, please point them to this post and video because the fact is that they are making an illegitimate argument about something that was never claimed by those who have real free energy technologies.

Please help spread this truth by using the share buttons below!

Aaron