The Power of the Aether as Related to Music and Electricity by Eric Dollard

The Power of the Aether as Related to Music and Electricity by Eric Dollard
The Power of the Aether as Related to Music and Electricity by Eric Dollard

The Power of the Aether as Related to Music and Electricity is the most recent presentation by Eric Dollard, which was given at the 2015 Energy Science & Technology Conference.

This is yet another groundbreaking presentation by Eric Dollard, which happens to include one of the most important explanations of J.J. Thomson’s work in regards to real aether physics.

It opens the doors to being able to directly engineer the aether but has evaded everyone since Thomson’s work was fairly convoluted and there was no continuity to his math. Eric straightened that out as much as possible and gave much needed clarity to the subject.

Here is a recent live interview with some callers who were either at the conference or purchased a copy of the presentation.

Get your copy at

Electrical charge is more than the electrons

It is known by those who are skilled in the art of some overunity electrical devices that there is more going on with the electrical current than the typical electron flow theory can account for.

For years, John Bedini has said that current meters that measure electron current only measure what is wasted. Eric Dollard has said that energy is the rate that electricity is being destroyed, which is the same thing since that current multiplied by voltage over time is energy, the destruction of organized potential, and that is what the meters are measuring.

In Jim Murray’s SERPS device, which has demonstrated almost 50 times more work being done than the net draw from the power supply, Jim has said that there is extra energy in the current. However, most conventionally trained engineers simply cannot comprehend how this can be.

For example, if we have an incandescent light bulb in an electrical circuit and we supply electricity to this load, the bulb will light up. However, a common idea is that the bulb is “burning up” all the electricity that passes through it, but nothing could be further from the truth.

In the SERPS for example, electricity is passed through a resistive load and then a capacitor is charged on the other side of the load. Then, at the right time, the capacitor is discharged backwards through the load back to the source (generator) turning it into a motor for that moment. So, if the generator is only a generator for 1/2 the time and is a motor 1/2 the time, the motor or prime mover moving the generator to begin with sees virtually no net load.

That demonstration alone is proof that there are some other properties to electrical current than what can be accounted for by simple electron current theory alone. There is something extra and the so-called electron current, which is measurable by common current meters cannot explain or account for it all – just as Bedini and Dollard has hinted.

A couple years ago, a very important announcement was made during research into “cuprate superconductors”, which contain copper, which revealed that, “electrons are not enough to carry the current. ” Discussion on this “violation” appears to go back to the 1990’s when searching online references.

Although these discussions focus on a very specific sets of conditions required to elicit such violations of common electron current theory, the implications are staggering when reading between the lines.

Whether superconductors are used or not, the fact is that there is more current being carried than can be accounted for by the electrons. So, what else is carrying the current? And does this actually give more credibility to some overunity claims where the end results are more than what can be accounted by measuring the output electrically?

For example, in the Bedini SG, if one were to measure the electrical output of a the machine, it is always less than what actually winds up in the battery. Stating it another way, there is more that winds up in the battery than can be measured leaving the circuit charging it. There are some interesting things that are happening in the battery, which allow the battery to start receiving free source potential from it’s environment, which doesn’t come from the electrical circuit – it’s related but not directly proportional.

Now, this understanding that shows that there is more to the current than the electrons can account for suggest other means for transferring potential to the battery, which probably can’t be measured by the meters. It is understood that there absolutely is more that winds up in the battery than can be measured leaving the circuit, which is indisputable and anything like this that  can contribute to a clearer understanding of these kinds of observations is more than welcome.

In the article from a few years ago, Electrons are not enough: Cuprate superconductors defy convention, The below diagram shows that there is more electrical charge than can be accounted for by electrons alone.

Luttinger’s theorem states that the number of electrons in a material is the same as the number of electrons in all of its atoms added together.

The researchers developed a model outlining the breakdown of Luttinger’s theorem that is applicable to cuprate superconductors, since the hypotheses that the theorem is built on are violated at certain energies in these materials. The group tested it and indeed found discrepancies between the measured charge and the number of mobile electrons in cuprate superconductors, defying Luttinger.

Something other than electrons carries the current.

Electrons are charged. Therefore, if an electron does not contribute to the charge count, then there is a lot of explaining to do.

They even state, “Now the researchers are exploring possible candidates for current-carriers, particularly a novel kind of excitation called unparticles.

Although the defiance of Luttinger’s Theorem is is not at astronomical proportions in this example, a deviation from the predicted amount is still a deviation. Something either follows the “rules” or it doesn’t.

The admission that there might be something other that carries the current is actually quite bold and could potentially rattle the cages of the classical electron flow theory. This isn’t a surprise for those involved in research into overunity systems, but it is a surprise to see conventional references admitting such a thing.

Here is the full article:

And here is the original paper:

The Lord’s Pump Project by Al Throckmorton

Ram Pumps can pump water to a decent height powered by nothing other than the movement of the water that its sitting in. Yes, it is a true free energy pump since we don’t have to pay for energy to run it, but it has its limitations. The volume of water that it moves is not very much and there is a limit to the height.

This is where Al Throckmorton’s development in this area not only shines, but completely reinvents the ram pump into something that was never thought possible.

Al Throckmorton's Pump
Al Throckmorton’s Pump

The pump consists of a chamber of water filled to a certain height while electrolyzed water gas fills the area above the water. There are two check valves to water can go into the chamber from one direction and leave the chamber in another direction. When there is enough water gas in the area above the water, a plasma ignition is triggered, which ignites the water gas and this creates a very high pressure explosion that pushes the water through the output check valve at over 200 psi!

A pressure relief valve then opens to release that pressure so more water can flow into it from the input check valve and the cycle repeats. This allows water to be pushed up to great heights under great pressure at a very high efficiency and the implications are profound.

Here is one of the old prototypes blasting water into the air with this process:

The Lord's Pump Project by Al Throckmorton
The Lord’s Pump Project by Al Throckmorton

Al Throckmorton gives an excellent presentation where he not only shows a lot of videos with tests of his pump but also some papers published with some very remarkable information about increasing gas production from water. Get a copy here:

Free Energy Flashlight


Imagine having a free energy flashlight that never has to have its power source replaced, you don’t have to plug it in, put it in the sun, crank a handle or shake it up… because it charges itself up. What if you were able to use it for a few hours, set it down and the next day, it is charged back up again?

Obviously, this would have serious implications not just for flashlights, but mobile phones and any other small devices that are normally powered by some small batteries.

In this case, it actually exists according to a company based out of Australia and they’re selling these free energy flashlights right now. We want to bring it to your attention.

The company claims their Free Energy Flashlight is powered by the Earth’s magnetic field and other electromagnetic waves aka electronic smog that is all around us. It’s not far fetched and a lot of big companies are taking this concept serious.

For a century, crystal radios are powered by the radio waves that they’re tuned to listen to. When you hear the radio station in the ear piece, it’s powered by free energy that you don’t have to pay for – it comes from the radio station.

RFIDs are also powered like this and some are even claiming to have developed it to a point, which it can charge a AA battery in a day. That might not seem like a lot, but what if you had that technology in every wall clock, mouse or wireless keyboard, remote controls, you name it… the batteries would never die and you would never have to replace them.

Dennis Siegel claims to have developed a circuit that will harvest enough to charge a AA battery like this. It appears to be nothing more than electromagnetic induction into a coil from the fields produced from electrical appliances, etc. But there are also models he developed that can harvest the same using much higher frequencies coming from radio, cell phone towers, etc… Read more about this here:

Even large corporations like Nokia have already announced that they’re looking to do the same thing in order to have a phone keep itself charge up. It’s been a while and we haven’t heard much more about it. They say it’s only outputting an amount of electricity that is too small so perhaps they haven’t exceeded the levels needed to accomplish the goal of keeping a phone charged up. Or, maybe its just too disruptive to pull hundreds of millions or billions of phones around the world eventually off the grid and have them all charged at the expense of the power company or home/business owners – seeing that the article came out 6 years ago, why would a company like Nokia with all its resources not be able to produce something like this? Even if it wasn’t built into the phone, they could build it into a phone case. If someone never had to plug it in, I’m sure they’d sell more than a few! Read about Nokia’s announcement on this here:

Free Energy Flashlight
Free Energy Flashlight

The company that actually has built a Free Energy Flashlight is Adgex. Here’s what they say, “…the use of the ‘Adgex Accumlator’ ELFE taps into the earth’s energy supplies and converts that power into usable energy. Yes, the Earth provides the energy to charge the light, it’s that simple, and that incredible.

You can use it for a few hours then set it down and the next day it will be charged back up!

You can get one: Free Energy Flashlight

If you want to join in on the discussion to look into it more, go here: