The award-winning documentary TAKE BACK YOUR POWER 2017 uncovers the shocking story behind why hundreds of local governments and millions of ratepayers are standing against the multi-billion dollar rollout of ‘smart’ utility meters. Take a journey of revelation, examining evidence of in-home surveillance, hundreds of home fires and several fatalities, systemic over-billing, health risks, unprecedented hacking vulnerability, and even extortion.
The insightful and often astounding new material in this 2017 final cut exposes the agenda behind smart meters with even more clarity. And the way to solution is also opened, as the forthcoming sequel – the InPower Movement – is introduced.
With compelling insight from whistleblowers, government agents, lawyers, doctors, researchers and environmentalists, Josh del Sol’s TAKE BACK YOUR POWER investigates the claimed benefits and emerging risks of a profit-based global initiative that seeks to change the way we live. What you’ll discover will surprise, unsettle and ultimately empower you.
WINNER: Leo Award, Best Feature Documentary Program in British Columbia
WINNER: AwareGuide Transformational Film of the Year
WINNER: IndieFest Annual Humanitarian Award
WINNER: NaturalHealth365 Film Of The Year
COMMENTS BY JOSH DEL SOL
If you haven’t seen it yet, this final cut has 20% new content since the original release, and is a streamlined 83 minutes. My two favorite new segments are Dr. Timothy Schoechle, and the crazy-blatant admissions by utilities of their illegal and unlawful conduct.
I’ve also got a new article on GreenMedInfo about ‘smart’ meters, 5G and the bigger picture, which also includes a brand new EMF guide that I’ll tell you more about soon – if you haven’t seen it yet. GreenMedInfo and its founder Sayer Ji are doing amazing work.
I’m grateful to finally be able to release TBYP on YouTube, with no strings attached. Could you help get the word out? If we can have large outlets share the film it would really help.
Onward we go. 🙂
Josh del Sol Beaulieu
Creator, Take Back Your Power
Co-founding Ambassador, InPower Movement
URGENT – FREE ENGINEERING REPORT BY ERIC DOLLARD ON WHY THE GRID HAS BECOME DEGENERATED AND WILL ACTUALLY ASSIST AN EMP ATTACK INTO CAUSING MORE DAMAGE! Ask Eric Dollard questions live about this topic.
The letter on Eric’s recent presentation page has been changed. We were waiting for this report and only just now have it available. Whether you have this presentation or not, READ THIS!! If that doesn’t make you concerned about what the grid has become, then nothing will.
Share this far and wide!
Anyone who does have this presentation by Sunday will be invited to a LIVE CALL with Eric Dollard (by email) to ask questions and discuss this very important topic.
Ed Leedskalnin, known for his amazing construction marvel Coral Castle, is credited with inventing a “Perpetual Motion Holder”, which consists of a U shaped core with a coil on both sides that are connected in criss-cross fashion. There is an iron keeper that closes the gap and when a battery is connected to the two coils, the keeper stays magnetized to the U permanently. This causes an internal magnetic current to run in the loop perpetually and when the keeper is finally removed by force, the magnetic field collapses and it causes the coils to output electricity.
The image above is a book cover to one of Ed Leedskalnin’s books, Mineral, Vegetable and Animal Life, which has the Perpetual Motion Holder depicted on the cover.
The Perpetual Motion Holder works as claimed and it is easy to build. What is interesting is that it is normally thought that current has to be supplied to the coils in order for the metal to become magnetized and when the current is removed, the magnetization disappears. However, this is not the case as is easily demonstrated by the Perpetual Motion Holder. Many people have had these devices magnetized for many, many years and no matter how long, when the remove the keeper, the coils output a pulse of electricity. It can be measured with a meter or you can see that it will light an LED, etc.
Einstein said that the key to creativity is to hide one’s sources and in this case, that is exactly what Ed Leedskalnin did. It was known that Leedskalnin was very studious and he examined much of the literature of his day regarding electricity, magnetism, biology, etc. During this time, one of the most famous books on magnetism, which is still a valuable resource was first published in the 1840’s and spelled out the Perpetual Motion Holder, but with a very different name – 100% exact explanation of the results of the device.
Davis’s Manual on Magnetism was one of the first and most popular books that detailed this device and virtually every technically oriented scholar at Princeton in that day knew of it. This is NOT the first reference to this device, but it is one of many from it’s time. There is an earlier reference and we’ll get to that soon.
Davis’s Manual on Magnetism – below are some pages from the book’s title page and the relevant pages for the Perpetual Motion Holder. Please read the comments in between some of the images:
You can see on page 75 above that image 126’s description is that of the Magic Circle – the original name for the Perpetual Motion Holder. If you have two semi-circles attached with a coil of wire around a side of this circle and charge it, the two iron semi-circles with stick together. If you remove the electricity, they continue to stick.
Below on page 76, you see a variation of this with handles that two people can pull on to demonstrate just how strong this effect is. And you see the details of its interesting properties:
“If the flow of the current in the coil is stopped while the armatures are applied to each other, as shown in figures 50 and 51, they will still continue firmly attached; but if once separated, will not adhere again.”
Below, you see in Fig. 53, the classic “STRONG” type of electromagnet as used by Ed Leedskalnin and is apparently invented by Prof. Henry who is mentioned in section 132 at the bottom of the page. We’ll discuss Prof. Henry soon.
Above is an image of another variation of the Magic Circle, which is designed for much stronger variations. It is a hybrid between the original Magic Circle and the strong electromagnet with coils on both legs of the horseshoe shaped core.
Below, it says, “If, however, the armature is applied to the poles, and the flow of the current is stopped while it is attached, it will continue to adhere for weeks or months with great force, so as to be able to sustain one third or one half as much weight as while the current was circulating. But if the keeper be once removed, nearly the whole magnetism will disappear, and the magnet, if of good iron, will not even be able to lift an ounce. The polarity of the magnet will of course be reversed by changing the direction of the current.”
That statement reveals that some of the power actually is lost after removing the battery, but for the most part, it sticks until manually removed – or until electricity with the opposite current is applied.
So there you have it, the full revelation of the “Perpetual Motion Holder from the 1840’s. The mention of Prof. Henry is very important because not only is he the inventor of these stronger electromagnets that went way beyond what anyone had developed before, but he appears to also be the inventor of the Magic Circle.
Joseph Henry was a contemporary of Michael Faraday and independently discovered the Laws of Electromagnetic Induction but about on year after Faraday. The unit of measurement for inductance is named after Joseph Henry.
In some of Joseph Henry’s notes, which are documented in a book called The Paper of Joseph Henry edited by Nathan Reingold, we see the earliest mention of the Magic Circle. This book details papers by Joseph Henry from November 1832 to December of 1835, which are called “The Princeton Years”.
Clearly, the editor of the book had absolutely no idea what the reference to the Magic Circle meant, but now you do! And it was in Joseph Henry’s notes around 50 years before Ed Leedskalnin was ever born.
This is the origin of the Perpetual Motion Holder, what is was originally called and who invented it. Please give credit where credit is due. The next time someone tells you about the Perpetual Motion Holder by Ed Leedskalnin, please kindly refer them to this page.
Please understand that this is not intended to take anything away from Ed Leedskalnin’s very interesting work but rather to correct a common misunderstanding about the Perpetual Motion Holder.
If you want to know how to make a simple one, this is one of the simplest How-To videos you can find:
The operating theory behind what maintains that magnetism is a whole other topic, but suffice to say, there is a magnetic current that is put into circulation around the loop. Many conventionally minded people do not believe in magnetic currents as they think a piece of metal that is magnetized only has a static field that just sits there. My opinion is that they are wrong, but that is another story.
Many years ago, John Bedini and I were discussing toroidal coils and he shared with me his belief that there is a magnetic current that is always in circulation around the ferrite core. The question then is how do we tap it for energy production? We did not come to a satisfactory answer, but something along these lines is possibly happening with Steve Marks’s TPU (Toroidal Power Unit).
Abstract says: Quantum mechanics predicts that the equilibrium state of a resistive metal ring will contain a dissipationless current. This persistent current has been the focus of considerable theoretical and experimental work, but its basic properties remain a topic of controversy. The main experimental challenges in studying persistent currents have been the small signals they produce and their exceptional sensitivity to their environment. We have developed a technique for detecting persistent currents that allows us to measure the persistent current in metal rings over a wide range of temperatures, ring sizes, and magnetic fields. Measurements of both a single ring and arrays of rings agree well with calculations based on a model of non-interacting electrons.
Alexis Guy Obolensky was a long time researcher into Tesla related technologies. People who worked with him in the past on various projects include Jim Murray, Prof. Robert Haralick, Paul LaViolette, Susan Manewich, and many others. I had the honor of corresponding with him periodically by email and knew his health was failing – he was working on a machine that he hoped would rejuvenate his body.
He died last month on January 9th – here is a copy of his obituary:
“OBOLENSKY–Alexis Guy – “Guy”, of Sloatsburg NY, died on January 9th, 2018. Born in Chicago on March 3rd, 1929 to Prince Michel Alexeievitch Obolensky and his wife, Kathleen (nee Trask, of Lima, OH). Guy was an inventor and experimental physicist, well known for his research based on the work of Nikola Tesla. Guy is survived by five children, Michael, Alexa, Nina, Anna and Helena; and four grandchildren. A memorial service will be held at 2pm, January 16th at Saint Mary’s Episcopal church, Tuxedo Park, NY.”
The Kromrey Generator is one of the most interesting generators that has made it to the public. Although it has never been mass produced, enough researchers and developers have built them to demonstrate that it definitely has some anomalous properties. John Bedini is one of those geniuses that has been involved with the Kromrey Generator before most have ever heard of it as well as having built many variations that hold up to the claims of the inventor.
At the 2016 Energy Science & Technology Conference, Peter Lindemann presented a large-scale Bedini SG that ran itself and kept its batteries charged up as well as demonstrating John’s 2 Pole larger Kromrey Generator. In the demonstration, it showed that the input motor drew about 32 watts while charging a battery with 72 watts. That is about twice as much output as what was being supplied to the input. Peter’s presentation that goes into the operation of this machine is available here titled Bedini SG – Beyond the Advanced Handbook – http://bedinisg.com
On that same website is the third SG book called Bedini SG – The Complete Advanced Handbook and that goes into a lot of the details on the Kromrey Generator as well.
Below is a video where I show a simple video of the machine actually speeding up as the output is shorted – normally, this would create so much counter-torque that it will make it very difficult for the input motor to turn. Instead, it actually climbs 50-60 rpm while the input power actually drops! There is a simple reason for this but there are other anomalous aspects that conventional science cannot explain such as the demonstration results that Peter showed at the conference. The below video also gives a few closeups of the Kromrey Generator that John Bedini built (one of them) as well as an error that I discovered in the Kromrey Generator patent that nobody has ever pointed out until now.
Make sure to register for the 2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference – you never know what we might show next! Energy Conference
Share this video with your friends with the share buttons below – not everyone has seen a generator that actually unloads the prime mover when it is shorted out! Please understand the significance of this machine is profound. Imagine a gas generator set running and you turn on some lights powered by the generator but the gas engine stays the same RPM. That means that it doesn’t take more electricity to power a load. I still consider this technology in its infancy and there is a lot of room for improvements, which may be coming out in the near future.
It includes the following presenters: Al Francoeur, Yaro Stanchak, Aaron Murakami, James Robitaille, Geoffrey Miller, and Jeff Moe.
For this second one, it includes Susan Manewich, Jeane Manning, Walt Jenkins, Dr. Paul LaViolette, Aaron Murakami, Prof. Robert Haralick and Paul Babcock.
This discussion concluded the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference and included topics such as Emotional Intelligence, Synchronicity, Remote Viewing, Creativity, the Subconscious Mind, the Collective Unconscious, and of course some discussion on Energy technologies. MUST SEE!